Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Standing or supine x-rays after total hip replacement - when is the safe zone not safe?
John Au1, Diana M Perriman, Teresa M Neeman
12 Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra - Australia.
Acetabular prosthesis orientation is critical for total hip replacement (THR) success. This study found that acetabular components safe in a supine position can be outside the safe zone when standing, increasing complication risks.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
Background:
- Acetabular prosthesis malorientation is a significant risk factor for complications following total hip replacement (THR).
- Current assessment of acetabular component orientation typically uses supine X-rays, but changes in patient positioning can alter pelvic tilt and thus orientation.
- Standing X-rays have been proposed as a more accurate method to assess acetabular orientation due to positional changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if acetabular components considered within the 'safe zone' in a supine position can fall outside this zone when the patient is standing.
- To evaluate the impact of body position (supine vs. standing) on pelvic tilt and acetabular component orientation (anteversion and inclination).
Main Methods:
- Thirty patients (12 male, 18 female) underwent pelvic X-rays (lateral and antero-posterior) in both standing and supine positions six weeks post-THR.
- Pelvic tilt, acetabular anteversion, and inclination were measured and compared against established 'safe zone' limits.
- Statistical analysis was performed to compare orientation in supine versus standing positions.
Main Results:
- In the standing position, patients exhibited a significant posterior pelvic tilt, leading to increased acetabular anteversion and inclination (p<0.0001).
- Of the 30 patients, 16 had acetabular components within the 'safe zone' while supine but outside the 'safe zone' when standing.
- Patients were significantly more likely to have their acetabular components outside the 'safe zone' in the standing position compared to the supine position (p<0.0001).
Conclusions:
- Acetabular component orientation assessed in the supine position may not accurately reflect orientation in the standing position.
- A significant proportion of acetabular components considered optimally positioned in supine may be malpositioned when standing, potentially increasing THR complication risks.
- Standing X-rays may provide a more clinically relevant assessment of acetabular orientation in total hip replacement.
More Related Videos
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
07:43In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021