Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.4K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.4K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

860
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
860
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

2.1K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Abdominal pseudohernia caused by thoracic disk herniation: case series and review of the literature.

Journal of surgical case reports·2025
Same author

Incidence of sacroiliac joint pain after lumbosacral spine fusion: A systematic review.

Neuro-Chirurgie·2023
Same author

Scottish Bowel Screening Programme colonoscopy quality - scope for improvement?

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2018
Same author

Effect of neurodynamic mobilization on fluid dispersion in median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel: A cadaveric study.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2017
Same author

Developing a national colorectal educational agenda: a survey of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2017
Same author

Analysis of delays in elective operating lists.

Saudi medical journal·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

3.5K

Validating the three-step return-to-play decision model.

I Shrier1, G O Matheson, M Boudier-Revéret

  • 1Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
|August 8, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validated a return-to-play (RTP) model, finding clinicians adjust decisions based on injury severity, sport risk, and other factors. The model accurately reflects clinical judgment across different healthcare professionals.

Keywords:
Return to playdecision makingreinjury

More Related Videos

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
08:13

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.4K
A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
10:31

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion

Published on: September 25, 2014

12.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

3.5K
Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
08:13

Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion

Published on: January 20, 2019

6.4K
A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion
10:31

A Multi-Modal Approach to Assessing Recovery in Youth Athletes Following Concussion

Published on: September 25, 2014

12.8K

Area of Science:

  • Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Rehabilitation Science

Background:

  • The return-to-play (RTP) process is complex, involving multiple factors.
  • A simplified, validated model is needed to guide clinicians.
  • Current RTP decision-making lacks a standardized, evidence-based framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate a novel, three-construct model for RTP decisions.
  • To assess the influence of injury severity, sport risk, and decision modifiers on RTP recommendations.
  • To evaluate model consistency across different clinical subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-over design utilizing clinical vignettes.
  • Online survey distributed to clinicians involved in RTP decisions.
  • Manipulation of injury severity, sport risk, and non-injury risk factors within vignettes.

Main Results:

  • Clinicians' RTP restrictions increased with injury severity.
  • RTP decisions were altered by changes in sport risk and non-injury risk factors.
  • Context-dependent effects were observed across different injury severities and clinical scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • The validated RTP decision model effectively simplifies the decision-making process.
  • The model aligns with clinical practice and recommendations from diverse healthcare professionals.
  • This framework supports consistent and evidence-based RTP decision-making in sports medicine.