Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC
Luis Paz-Ares1, Denis Soulières, Joachim Moecks
1Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (HUVR, US and CSIC) and Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain.
Abstract:
Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) appear to gain particular benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) if their disease tests positive for EGFR activating mutations. Recently, several large, controlled, phase III studies have been published in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumours. Given the increased patient dataset now available, a comprehensive literature search for EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was undertaken to update the results of a previously published pooled analysis. Pooling eligible progression-free survival (PFS) data from 27 erlotinib studies (n = 731), 54 gefitinib studies (n = 1802) and 20 chemotherapy studies (n = 984) provided median PFS values for each treatment. The pooled median PFS was: 12.4 months (95% accuracy intervals [AI] 11.6-13.4) for erlotinib-treated patients; 9.4 months (95% AI 9.0-9.8) for gefitinib-treated patients; and 5.6 months (95% AI 5.3-6.0) for chemotherapy. Both erlotinib and gefitinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than chemotherapy (permutation testing; P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively). Data on more recent TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib and icotinib) were insufficient at this time-point to carry out a pooled PFS analysis on these compounds. The results of this updated pooled analysis suggest a substantial clear PFS benefit of treating patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with erlotinib or gefitinib compared with chemotherapy.
Insights
Patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) benefit significantly from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Erlotinib and gefitinib demonstrated substantially longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR activating mutations show improved outcomes with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
- Recent phase III studies provide a larger dataset for evaluating EGFR TKIs versus chemotherapy in this patient population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update a previous pooled analysis by conducting a comprehensive literature search for EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between erlotinib, gefitinib, and chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients.
Main Methods:
- Pooled progression-free survival (PFS) data from 27 erlotinib studies (n=731), 54 gefitinib studies (n=1802), and 20 chemotherapy studies (n=984).
- Statistical analysis using permutation testing to compare PFS between treatment groups.
Main Results:
- Pooled median PFS: Erlotinib 12.4 months, Gefitinib 9.4 months, Chemotherapy 5.6 months.
- Both erlotinib and gefitinib showed significantly longer PFS than chemotherapy (P=0.000 for both).
- Data for newer TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib, icotinib) were insufficient for pooled analysis.
Conclusions:
- Treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib offers a substantial progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC compared to chemotherapy.
- These findings reinforce the efficacy of first-generation EGFR TKIs in this specific NSCLC subgroup.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
13:34A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016