Misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: systematic review and meta-analysis

Bilal Azhar1, Shaneel R Patel, Peter J E Holt

  • 1Department of Outcomes Research, St George's Vascular Institute, St George's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.

Abstract

Insights

Misdiagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) occurs in 42% of cases, with similar rates over time. Key symptoms include abdominal pain and shock, often mistaken for other conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine

Background:

  • Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a life-threatening condition.
  • High mortality rates are associated with delayed diagnosis and treatment.
  • Accurate and timely diagnosis is critical for patient survival.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the incidence of misdiagnosis in patients with rAAA.
  • To identify the most frequent presenting features of rAAA.
  • To determine the common incorrect differential diagnoses for rAAA.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search using EMBASE and MEDLINE databases.
  • PRISMA guidelines followed for study selection.
  • Random-effects meta-analysis to pool data on misdiagnosis rates, presenting features, and differential diagnoses.

Main Results:

  • A pooled analysis of 9 studies (1109 patients) revealed a 42% incidence of rAAA misdiagnosis.
  • In studies published after 1990, the misdiagnosis rate was 32%.
  • Common misdiagnoses included ureteric colic and myocardial infarction; key presenting features were abdominal pain (61%), shock (46%), and pulsatile mass (45%).

Conclusions:

  • The consistent and high rate of rAAA misdiagnosis is a significant concern.
  • There is a critical need for improved clinical decision support tools for emergency diagnosis and triage.
  • Enhanced diagnostic strategies are required to reduce mortality associated with rAAA.

Related Concept Videos