A randomized controlled pilot trial of the functional assessment screening tablet to engage patients at the point of care
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
Rachel Hess1, Hilary Tindle, Molly B Conroy
1Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, rachel.hess@hsc.utah.edu.
Background:
Healthcare providers play an important role in encouraging healthy behaviors and improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL). They are most effective when they partner with informed, engaged patients.
Objective:
To examine the impact of a new health-information technology intervention (FAST-Feedback) that provides patients with immediate, personalized, guideline-based feedback regarding tobacco use, physical activity, and HRQoL, and encourages patients to initiate discussions regarding these topics with their primary care physician.
Design:
A pilot, randomized controlled trial clustered by resident physician, with patients as the unit of analysis.
Participants:
Resident physicians and their out-patients in a single academic health center between May and October 2011.
Intervention:
Patients received (intervention) or did not receive (control) FAST-Feedback prior to the clinical encounter.
Main Outcome Measures:
Primary outcomes were patient reports of initiating any discussions regarding tobacco use, physical activity, and HRQoL. Subgroup analyses examined patient reports of discussions regarding tobacco use, physical activity, and HRQoL, respectively.
Key Results:
Thirty of the 36 eligible resident physicians (83%) agreed to participate; 173 of their 415 eligible patients (42%) expressed interest in the study and 99 (24%) consented to participate. Compared to controls, a higher percentage of intervention patients reported initiating any discussion with their resident physician, although this difference was not statistically significant (40% vs. 27%; p = 0.12). For subgroup analyses regarding specific topics of discussion, patients in the intervention group reported initiating more discussions regarding mental HRQoL than controls (23% vs. 0%; p = 0.02). There was no difference in patient reports of initiating discussions regarding smoking, physical activity or physical HRQoL.
Conclusions:
Providing patients with immediate, personalized, guideline-based feedback prior to the clinical encounter can increase patient-initiated discussions regarding mental HRQoL. Future work should test FAST-Feedback in a larger population and evaluate the impact on tobacco cessation, increased physical activity, and improvements in HRQoL.
