Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Realizing the potential of plasma genotyping in an age of genotype-directed therapies
Jason J Luke1, Geoffrey R Oxnard1, Cloud P Paweletz1
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (JJL, GRO, CPP, BEJ), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (DBS), University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO (DRC); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (JVH).
Abstract:
The identification of oncogenic driver mutations in cancer has led to the rapid rise of genotype-directed treatments such as EGFR and BRAF kinase inhibitors. Standard tumor biopsy remains a cumbersome and morbid procedure for patients, leading to a growing interest in noninvasive plasma genotyping approaches. Circulating tumor cells are of interest; however, the processing of specimens is complicated and time consuming. By comparison, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping has the potential to be convenient and relatively simple to process in a short time period. Several technologies are under development for cfDNA analysis, such as allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), coamplification at Lower Denaturation temperatures (COLD) PCR, emulsion PCR, and massively parallel sequencing. Broad clinical validity will need to be established for different assays, and clinical utility will need to be evaluated within prospective trials to determine which assays will best predict the efficacy of therapy and patient outcomes. In addition, assay standardization will be critical prior to widespread use in routine clinical practice. The Cell Free DNA Working Group, under the sponsorship of Transgenomic, was convened to evaluate the molecular assays in development and provide recommendations for application and interpretation of these tests in the context of future clinical research. The consensus commentary of the Cell Free DNA Working Group for the use of cfDNA plasma genotyping assays is presented here, including future steps in the development of these technologies.
Insights
Plasma genotyping using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers a less invasive alternative to tumor biopsies for cancer treatment selection. Further validation and standardization of cfDNA assays are crucial for clinical application.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Genetics
Background:
- Genotype-directed cancer therapies, like EGFR and BRAF inhibitors, are increasingly used.
- Traditional tumor biopsies are invasive and burdensome for patients.
- Noninvasive plasma genotyping is gaining interest as an alternative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and provide recommendations on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) plasma genotyping assays.
- To discuss the development and clinical application of these emerging technologies.
Main Methods:
- Review of technologies for cfDNA analysis, including allele-specific PCR, COLD PCR, emulsion PCR, and massively parallel sequencing.
- Consensus commentary from the Cell Free DNA Working Group.
Main Results:
- cfDNA genotyping presents a convenient and rapid alternative to tumor biopsies.
- Several cfDNA analysis technologies are under development.
- Clinical validity and utility require further evaluation in prospective trials.
Conclusions:
- Standardization of cfDNA assays is critical for routine clinical practice.
- Prospective trials are needed to establish assay validity and utility for predicting treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.
- The Cell Free DNA Working Group offers recommendations for the use and interpretation of cfDNA plasma genotyping assays in research.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism: Overview
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Pharmacogenetics of Phase I Enzymes: Cytochrome P450 Isozymes

