Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Ranks01:02

Ranks

586
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
586
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II01:19

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II

1.3K
In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
1.3K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

593
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
593
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

13.1K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
13.1K
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I01:15

Routh-Hurwitz Criterion I

736
Consider an electrical power grid, where stability is essential to prevent blackouts. The Routh-Hurwitz criterion is a valuable tool for assessing system stability under varying load conditions or faults. By analyzing the closed-loop transfer function, the Routh-Hurwitz criterion helps determine whether the system remains stable.
To apply the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, a Routh table is constructed. The table's rows are labeled with powers of the complex frequency variable s, starting from the...
736
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

7.0K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypothesis generation for rare and undiagnosed diseases through clustering and classifying time-versioned biological ontologies.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population.

Cureus·2024
Same author

Author Correction: A multiplexed, paired-pooled droplet digital PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Patterns of on-scene and healthcare system trauma deaths in the Western Cape of South Africa.

World journal of surgery·2024
Same author

Feasibility of conducting a military-relevant multicenter cohort study to assess outcomes of early trauma resuscitative interventions in a prolonged care civilian setting.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2023
Same author

A multiplexed, paired-pooled droplet digital PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva.

Scientific reports·2023
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K

Likelihoods for fixed rank nomination networks.

Peter Hoff1, Bailey Fosdick2, Alex Volfovsky3

  • 1Departments of Statistics and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Network Science (Cambridge University Press)
|August 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Analyzing social network data requires appropriate methods. Using standard models for incomplete fixed rank nomination (FRN) data can lead to misleading results, highlighting the need for FRN-specific statistical approaches.

Keywords:
censoringlatent variablemarginal likelihoodmissing datanetworkordinal dataranked datasocial relations model

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

872
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 26, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

872
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Social network analysis
  • Statistical modeling
  • Survey methodology

Background:

  • Social network studies often collect incomplete data using methods like fixed rank nomination (FRN).
  • Standard statistical models typically assume complete binary networks, ignoring the ranked and censored nature of FRN data.
  • Analyzing FRN data with models for complete networks may yield inaccurate inferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Bayesian parameter estimates from complete binary network models versus models accounting for FRN data.
  • To determine if standard models provide misleading inference when applied to FRN data.
  • To assess the impact of using FRN-specific likelihoods in real-world social network analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and compared Bayesian parameter estimates using two types of likelihoods: one for complete binary networks and one derived from the FRN scheme.
  • Employed analytical derivations and simulation studies to evaluate the performance of each likelihood.
  • Applied both likelihoods to analyze empirical data from adolescent social networks.

Main Results:

  • Analytical and simulation results demonstrate that the binary network likelihood can produce misleading statistical inference, especially for parameters linking network ties to individual or pair characteristics.
  • Data analysis revealed instances where parameter estimates differed significantly between the binary and FRN likelihoods.
  • These differences in estimates led to divergent conclusions in some adolescent social network analyses.

Conclusions:

  • Analyzing fixed rank nomination (FRN) data using models designed for complete binary networks can lead to significant inferential errors.
  • It is crucial to employ statistical methods that specifically accommodate the ranked and censored nature of FRN survey data.
  • Proper analysis of FRN data ensures more accurate and reliable insights into social network structures and dynamics.