Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Construct validity and reliability of the adult rejection sensitivity questionnaire: a comparison of three factor
Marco Innamorati1, Michela Balsamo2, Beth Fairfield2
1Department of Psychological, Humanistic and Territorial Sciences (DISPUTer), "G. d'Annunzio" University, 66013 Chieti, Italy ; European University of Rome, 00163 Rome, Italy ; Skinner Institute, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
Objectives and Methods. The aim of the study was to investigate the construct validity of the ARSQ. Methods. The ARSQ and self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and hopelessness were administered to 774 Italian adults, aged 18 to 64 years. Results. Structural equation modeling indicated that the factor structure of the ARSQ can be represented by a bifactor model: a general rejection sensitivity factor and two group factors, expectancy of rejection and rejection anxiety. Reliability of observed scores was not satisfactory: only 44% of variance in observed total scores was due to the common factors. The analyses also indicated different correlates for the general factor and the group factors. Limitations. We administered an Italian version of the ARSQ to a nonclinical sample of adults, so that studies which use clinical populations or the original version of the ARSQ could obtain different results from those presented here. Conclusion. Our results suggest that the construct validity of the ARSQ is disputable and that rejection anxiety and expectancy could bias individuals to readily perceive and strongly react to cues of rejection in different ways.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Hazan and Shaver's Attachment Styles
Surveys

