Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
Mild prematurity, proximal social processes, and development
Hilary K Brown1, Kathy Nixon Speechley2, Jennifer Macnab3
1Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karen.Campbell@schulich.uwo.ca.
Insights
Gestational age is not the primary driver of developmental outcomes in children born late preterm or early term. Social factors, such as parenting, play a more significant role in child development closer to full term.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric developmental outcomes
- Perinatal research
- Social determinants of health
Background:
- Late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early term (37-38 weeks) births are increasing globally.
- Previous research suggests potential risks associated with these birth categories compared to full term (39-41 weeks).
- The influence of gestational age versus social factors on developmental trajectories requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between gestational age (late preterm, early term, full term) and developmental outcomes in children.
- To examine the role of proximal social processes, specifically parenting, in moderating this association.
- To determine the relative contributions of gestational age and social factors to developmental outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth data.
- Inclusion of singletons born between 34 and 41 weeks gestational age.
- Utilized multivariable modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) for developmental outcomes at 2-3 and 4-5 years.
- Employed moderation analyses to assess the impact of parenting.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted analyses indicated a higher risk of developmental delay for late preterm births.
- Adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in developmental outcomes between late preterm, early term, and full-term infants at 2-3 or 4-5 years.
- Parenting significantly predicted developmental outcomes but did not moderate the effect of gestational age.
Conclusions:
- Gestational age within the late preterm and early term ranges does not appear to be a significant independent predictor of developmental outcomes when adjusted for social factors.
- Social factors, particularly parenting, are crucial influences on child development, especially for those born closer to full term.
- Future interventions should focus on social support and parenting to optimize developmental trajectories.
Objective:
To elucidate the role of gestational age in determining the risk of poor developmental outcomes among children born late preterm (34-36 weeks) and early term (37-38 weeks) versus full term (39-41 weeks) by examining the contribution of gestational age to these outcomes in the context of proximal social processes.
Methods:
This was an analysis of the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Developmental outcomes were examined at 2 to 3 (N= 15099) and 4 to 5 years (N= 12302). The sample included singletons, delivered at 34 to 41 weeks, whose respondents were their biological mothers. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to directly estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs). We assessed the role of parenting by using moderation analyses.
Results:
In unadjusted analyses, children born late preterm appeared to have greater risk for developmental delay (relative risk = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.56) versus full term. In adjusted analyses, results were nonsignificant at 2 to 3 years (late preterm aRR = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.42; early term aRR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27) and 4 to 5 years (late preterm aRR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.43; early term aRR = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.25). Parenting did not modify the effect of gestational age but was a strong predictor of poor developmental outcomes.
Conclusions:
Our findings show that, closer to full term, social factors (not gestational age) may be the most important influences on development.
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Relationship with Parents: Attachment
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Neurulation
Teratogenicity
Development of the Oral Microbiota

