Related Experiment Videos
Weight gain in supervised and take-home feeding programmes in Chad
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
|October 1, 1989
Summary
Supplementary feeding programs for malnourished Chadian children showed similar weight gain whether children attended a feeding center or received food at home. Both strategies effectively supported child rehabilitation.
Area of Science:
- Public Health Nutrition
- Pediatric Malnutrition Rehabilitation
- International Health Interventions
Background:
- Childhood malnutrition remains a significant public health issue in many developing regions.
- Supplementary feeding programs are crucial interventions for rehabilitating malnourished children.
- Assessing the effectiveness of different delivery strategies is vital for optimizing program impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the rehabilitative effects of two supplementary feeding strategies.
- To determine the efficacy of feeding centre-based versus take-home feeding programs.
- To analyze anthropometric data for weight gain in malnourished children.
Main Methods:
- A supervised feeding program and a take-home feeding program were implemented.
- A total of 774 malnourished Chadian children (≤80% median reference weight for height) were enrolled.
- A regression model analyzed anthropometric data from follow-up measures over a mean stay of 59 days.
Main Results:
- The supervised group achieved an average weight gain of 1013 g over 60 days.
- The take-home group achieved an average weight gain of 951 g over 60 days.
- The difference in weight gain between the two strategies (62 g) was not statistically significant (P = 0.56).
Conclusions:
- Both feeding centre-based and take-home supplementary feeding strategies are effective for child rehabilitation.
- No significant difference in weight gain was observed between the two delivery methods.
- Program delivery strategy may not be a critical factor in the rehabilitative success of supplementary feeding.