Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 26, 2026

Removal of Arsenic Using a Cationic Polymer Gel Impregnated with Iron Hydroxide
Published on: June 28, 2019
Iron amendments to reduce bioaccessible arsenic
William G Cutler1, Aly El-Kadi2, Nguyen V Hue3
1Integral Consulting Inc., 285 Century Place, Suite 190, Louisville, CO 80027, USA; Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East-west Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
Iron-based soil treatments effectively reduce arsenic (As) bioaccessibility on Hawaii Island, offering a cost-effective alternative to landfilling. This method sequesters arsenic (As), lowering potential human health risks from contaminated soils.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Soil Science
- Geochemistry
Background:
- Historical use of arsenical pesticides has led to elevated soil arsenic (As) levels on former sugarcane lands in Hawaii.
- Assessing human health risks and determining remediation needs involves evaluating the bioaccessible fraction of total As (AsTOT).
- In vitro bioaccessible As (AsIVBA) is a key metric for understanding potential As uptake through incidental soil ingestion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of ferric chloride plus lime and ferrous sulfate plus lime in reducing in vitro bioaccessible As (AsIVBA) in contaminated soils.
- To investigate the role of iron (Fe) oxyhydroxide formation in sequestering arsenic (As).
- To assess the impact of phosphate (PO4) addition on AsIVBA in treated and untreated soils.
Main Methods:
- Field plot experiments were conducted on As-contaminated soils from Hawaii.
- Two iron (Fe) sources (ferric chloride and ferrous sulfate) were applied with lime at different concentrations (0.25wt% and 0.5wt% Fe).
- In vitro bioaccessibility assays were performed over a 2-year period, with additional tests involving phosphate (PO4) amendment.
Main Results:
- Both Fe sources significantly reduced AsIVBA, with higher reductions observed at the 0.5wt% Fe dosage (59-63%) compared to 0.25wt% Fe (30-41%).
- The two Fe treatments performed similarly in reducing AsIVBA over the 2-year observation period.
- Addition of phosphate (PO4) to both treated and untreated soils resulted in a significant increase in AsIVBA, more than doubling it in some cases.
Conclusions:
- In situ application of ferrous sulfate plus lime is a cost-effective method for reducing AsIVBA in contaminated soils, estimated to be significantly cheaper than excavation and landfill disposal.
- The formation of additional Fe oxyhydroxides effectively sequesters arsenic (As), lowering its bioaccessible fraction.
- Phosphate addition should be carefully considered as it can increase AsIVBA, potentially counteracting remediation efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Microbial Leaching
Acid Mine Drainage
Microbes and Other Elemental Cycles
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Periodic Table Provides Information...

