Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
Published on: May 10, 2024
A community-based multicenter trial of pharmacokinetically guided 5-fluorouracil dosing for personalized colorectal
Jai N Patel1, Bert H O'Neil2, Allison M Deal2
1Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA; Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Institute for Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, and Biostatistics Core, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA; Rex Healthcare, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; Leo W. Jenkins Cancer Center, Greenville, North Carolina, USA; Marion L. Shepard Cancer Center, Washington, North Carolina, USA; Cancer Care of Western North Carolina, Asheville, North Carolina, USA; Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA jai.patel@carolinashealthcare.org.
Background:
Pharmacokinetically guided (PK-guided) versus body surface area-based 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dosing results in higher response rates and better tolerability. A paucity of data exists on PK-guided 5-FU dosing in the community setting.
Patients And Methods:
Seventy colorectal cancer patients, from one academic and five community cancer centers, received the mFOLFOX6 regimen (5-FU 2,400 mg/m(2) over 46 hours every 2 weeks) with or without bevacizumab at cycle 1. The 5-FU continuous-infusion dose was adjusted for cycles 2-4 using a PK-guided algorithm to achieve a literature-based target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The primary objective was to demonstrate that PK-guided 5-FU dosing improves the ability to achieve a target AUC within four cycles of therapy. The secondary objective was to demonstrate reduced incidence of 5-FU-related toxicities.
Results:
At cycles 1 and 4, 27.7% and 46.8% of patients achieved the target AUC (20-25 mg × hour/L), respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 2.20; p = .046). Significantly more patients were within range at cycle 4 compared with a literature rate of 20% (p < .0001). Patients had significantly higher odds of not being underdosed at cycle 4 versus cycle 1 (OR: 2.29; p = .037). The odds of a patient being within range increased by 30% at each subsequent cycle (OR: 1.30; p = .03). Less grade 3/4 mucositis and diarrhea were observed compared with historical data (1.9% vs 16% and 5.6% vs 12%, respectively); however, rates of grade 3/4 neutropenia were similar (33% vs 25%-50%).
Conclusion:
PK-guided 5-FU dosing resulted in significantly fewer underdosed patients and less gastrointestinal toxicity and allows for the application of personalized colorectal cancer therapy in the community setting.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Dosage Regimen: Individualization

