Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: comparison of image quality between monopolar and bipolar acquisition
Andrew B Rosenkrantz1, Christian Geppert, Michael Kiritsy
1Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA, Andrew.Rosenkrantz@nyumc.org.
Purpose:
To compare image quality of monopolar and bipolar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences of the liver at 3T.
Methods:
32 healthy volunteers (mean 27 ± 8 years; 27 M/5F) and 11 patients (mean age 58 ± 14 years; 8 M/3F) underwent liver MRI using a 3T system incorporating 2-channel parallel transmission for B1-shimming and reduced B1-inhomogeneity. Scans included free-breathing DWI sequences (b-value 0, 400, 800 s/mm(2)) acquired using both monopolar and bipolar techniques. Estimated signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and measures of subjective image quality on b-800 images, scored on a 1-5 scale by two independent radiologists, were compared between sequences.
Results:
Monopolar sequence demonstrated significantly higher eSNR (volunteers: 12.7 ± 4.0 vs. 11.3 ± 3.5, patients: 11.4 ± 4.0 vs. 10.2 ± 3.3; p ≤ 0.013) compared with the bipolar sequence. Monopolar sequence also achieved significantly higher scores for reader 1 in volunteers and patients in terms of clarity of right lobe edge, clarity of intra-hepatic vessels, conspicuity of the left lobe, and overall diagnostic quality (p ≤ 0.031), as well as significantly higher scores for reader 2 in volunteers in terms of clarity of intra-hepatic vessels, conspicuity of the left lobe, and overall diagnostic quality (p ≤ 0.035). Respiratory motion artifact was not significantly different between sequences in patients or volunteers for either reader (p ≥ 0.191). Hepatic ADC was significantly lower using monopolar technique only in volunteers (1.28 ± 0.12 vs. 1.43 ± 0.15, p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
In comparison with past studies performed at 1.5T, when using a modern 3T system, we observed improved image quality of liver DWI using a monopolar, rather than a bipolar, acquisition scheme, largely attributed to higher eSNR.
Insights
Monopolar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) offers superior liver MRI quality at 3T compared to bipolar DWI, demonstrating higher signal-to-noise ratio and better diagnostic clarity. This monopolar technique enhances image quality for liver assessments.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging Physics
Background:
- Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is crucial for liver assessment.
- Optimizing DWI sequence quality at 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for accurate diagnosis.
- Monopolar and bipolar DWI sequences have different characteristics affecting image quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the image quality of monopolar and bipolar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences for liver imaging at 3T.
- To evaluate signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and subjective image quality between the two DWI techniques.
Main Methods:
- 32 healthy volunteers and 11 patients underwent liver MRI at 3T.
- Free-breathing DWI sequences (b-values 0, 400, 800 s/mm²) were acquired using both monopolar and bipolar techniques.
- Image quality metrics including eSNR, ADC, and radiologist-scored subjective quality were compared.
Main Results:
- The monopolar sequence showed significantly higher eSNR in both volunteers and patients.
- Radiologists assigned higher scores for subjective image quality (clarity, conspicuity, diagnostic quality) to the monopolar sequence.
- No significant difference in respiratory motion artifact was observed between sequences.
Conclusions:
- Monopolar DWI sequences provide improved liver image quality at 3T compared to bipolar sequences.
- Higher eSNR is a primary factor contributing to the enhanced image quality with the monopolar technique.
- The findings suggest monopolar DWI is preferable for liver imaging at 3T.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

