Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Outcomes of patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Rayan Yousefzai1, Navkaranbir Bajaj1, Amar Krishnaswamy2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone improved ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) in 36.5% of patients. This improvement correlated with reduced left ventricular size and increased ejection fraction, suggesting PCI benefits for IMR patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is linked to adverse outcomes in coronary artery disease patients.
- The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on IMR is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of patients with severe IMR undergoing PCI.
- To identify predictors of IMR improvement after PCI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 137 patients with severe (≥3+) IMR who underwent PCI between 1998 and 2010.
- Improvement defined as reduction in IMR severity to ≤2+ solely with PCI.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with and without IMR improvement.
Main Results:
- 36.5% of patients experienced IMR improvement with PCI alone; 18.5% required additional interventions.
- Smaller left atrial size predicted IMR improvement (OR 0.39).
- Patients with IMR improvement showed significant left ventricular reverse remodeling (decreased size, increased ejection fraction).
Conclusions:
- PCI alone can improve IMR severity in a significant proportion of patients.
- IMR improvement after PCI is associated with favorable left ventricular remodeling.
- Left atrial size is a key predictor for IMR improvement post-PCI.
Abstract:
Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. The impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on patients with IMR is not well elucidated. We sought to determine the outcomes of patients with severe IMR who underwent PCI. Patients with severe (≥3+) IMR who underwent PCI from 1998 to 2010 were identified. Improvement in IMR was defined as reduction in severity from ≥3+ to ≤2+ without any other invasive intervention beyond PCI. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without improvement in IMR after PCI. One hundred thirty-seven patients with severe IMR were included in our study. After PCI, 50 patients (36.5%) had improvement in IMR with PCI alone and 24 patients (18.5%) required another intervention. Left atrial size was a significant predictor of improvement in IMR (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 0.8). Left ventricular size decreased (systolic diameter 3.9±0.3 vs 4.6±0.2 cm, p=0.0008 and diastolic diameter 5.2±0.2 vs 5.7±0.2 cm, p=0.002) and ejection fraction increased (39.1±4.0% vs 33.1±1.9%, p=0.002) significantly after PCI in the patients with improvement in IMR compared with patients without improvement. Patients with improvement in IMR had numerically better survival; however, it was not statistically significant (p log-rank=0.2). In conclusion, 1/3 of the patients with IMR had improvement in severity of IMR with PCI alone. Improvement in IMR was associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling. Left atrial size was an important predictor of improvement in IMR after PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

