Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases.
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Genome-wide genetic overlap between fear-based disorders and generalised anxiety disorder.

Molecular psychiatry·2026

Same author

Strategic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Australia-Systems Genomics Consortium (SALSA-SGC): cohort profile.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Genome-wide meta-analysis of quantitatively measured generalized anxiety symptoms in individuals of European ancestry.

Nature human behaviour·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Genome-wide fine-mapping improves identification of causal variants.

Nature genetics·2026

Same author

Extensive antagonistic variants across the human genome.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Poor mood after oral contraceptive use is associated with increased vulnerability to peripartum depression, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and higher genetic risk for depression.

Archives of women's mental health·2026

Same journal

Modeling and analysis of forward and inverse kinematics for a flexible Stewart platform.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare utilization amongst people living with sickle cell disease in the United States: A scoping review.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Enhancing data completeness in time series: Imputation strategies for missing data using significant periodically correlated components.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Key targets and mechanisms by which gut microbiota-derived metabolites regulate Alzheimer's disease through the immune - inflammatory pathway: Based on network pharmacology and molecular docking.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

Grid-tied Transformer-less Boost Switched Capacitor Topology (TLBSCT) for PV applications.

PloS one·2026

Same journal

The load-velocity profiles and exercise-specific velocity zones for seven commonly used weightlifting exercises.

PloS one·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

A comparative study of techniques for differential expression analysis on RNA-Seq data.

Zong Hong Zhang¹, Dhanisha J Jhaveri¹, Vikki M Marshall¹

¹The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

|August 15, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares RNA-Seq analysis tools for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs). edgeR slightly outperforms DESeq and Cuffdiff2 in finding true positives, but DESeq or tool intersections minimize false positives.

More Related Videos

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Area of Science:

Transcriptomics
Bioinformatics
Next-generation sequencing

Background:

RNA-Seq is crucial for transcriptomic studies, particularly for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
Numerous software tools exist for DEG analysis, but consensus on optimal study design and tool selection is lacking.
Evaluating DEG analysis software performance is essential for reliable transcriptomic research.

Purpose of the Study:

To comparatively evaluate the performance of three popular RNA-Seq analysis tools: Cufflinks-Cuffdiff2, DESeq, and edgeR.
To assess the impact of key RNA-Seq parameters (replicates, sequencing depth) on DEG detection accuracy.
To provide recommendations for optimal DEG analysis strategies based on study objectives.

Main Methods:

Performance benchmarking of Cufflinks-Cuffdiff2, DESeq, and edgeR using RNA-Seq data.
Consideration of parameters: number of replicates, sequencing depth, and depth balance.
Validation of DEG calls against quantitative RT-PCR and microarray data.

Main Results:

edgeR demonstrated a slight advantage in identifying true positive DEGs compared to DESeq and Cuffdiff2.
DESeq and the intersection of multiple tools showed better performance in minimizing false positives.
Performance varied based on sequencing depth and the number of replicates used.

Conclusions:

edgeR is a slightly preferable choice for differential expression analysis when maximizing true positive detection is key, accepting a potential increase in false positives.
For studies prioritizing the minimization of false positives, DESeq or combining results from multiple DEG analysis tools is recommended.
Optimal RNA-Seq study design and tool selection depend on specific research goals and data characteristics.