Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide in coronary stenting
Tilak Pasala1, Prasongchai Sattayaprasert1, Pradeep K Bhat1
1The Heart and Vascular Center, Case Western Reserve University/MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Insights
Eptifibatide, an antiplatelet drug, showed benefits in older studies for percutaneous coronary intervention. However, current evidence suggests its routine use is offset by bleeding risks and is not cost-effective with newer therapies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Platelet aggregation post-coronary stenting poses significant clinical and economic risks.
- Eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, targets platelet aggregation via intravenous administration.
- Effective platelet inhibition is crucial during and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To review clinical and economic data of eptifibatide in the context of modern antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies.
- To assess the current viability of eptifibatide use in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic studies on eptifibatide.
- Analysis of eptifibatide's efficacy and safety in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI.
- Evaluation of eptifibatide's cost-effectiveness against contemporary treatments.
Main Results:
- Eptifibatide demonstrated reduced mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization in older studies.
- Recent trials show eptifibatide's benefits are diminished by increased bleeding risk, especially with dual antiplatelet therapy and newer anticoagulants.
- Current guidelines recommend eptifibatide only for select high-risk PCI patients on traditional anticoagulants, not with bivalirudin.
- Older economic models favored eptifibatide, but current analyses suggest it's not cost-effective due to bleeding complications and newer agents.
Conclusions:
- The clinical benefits of eptifibatide are largely offset by bleeding risks in the current therapeutic landscape.
- Routine eptifibatide use is discouraged due to unfavorable cost-effectiveness compared to newer anticoagulants and P2Y12 inhibitors.
- Further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of eptifibatide with bleeding-risk-reduction strategies like transradial access.
Abstract:
Platelet adhesion and aggregation at the site of coronary stenting can have catastrophic clinical and economic consequences. Therefore, effective platelet inhibition is vital during and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eptifibatide is an intravenous antiplatelet agent that blocks the final common pathway of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation by binding to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on the surface of platelets. In clinical studies, eptifibatide was associated with a significant reduction of mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, recent trials conducted in the era of dual antiplatelet therapy and newer anticoagulants failed to demonstrate similar results. The previously seen favorable benefit of eptifibatide was mainly offset by the increased risk of bleeding. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend its use as an adjunct in high-risk patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with traditional anticoagulants (heparin or enoxaparin), who are not otherwise at high risk of bleeding. In patients receiving bivalirudin (a newer safer anticoagulant), routine use of eptifibatide is discouraged except in select situations (eg, angiographic complications). Although older pharmacoeconomic studies favor eptifibatide, in the current era of P2Y12 inhibitors and newer safer anticoagulants, the increased costs associated with bleeding make the routine use of eptifibatide an economically nonviable option. The cost-effectiveness of eptifibatide with the use of strategies that decrease the bleeding risk (eg, transradial access) is unknown. This review provides an overview of key clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide well into the current era of potent antiplatelet agents, novel safer anticoagulants, and contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

