Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Brain Morphology of Cannabis Users With or Without Psychosis: A Pilot MRI Study
Published on: August 18, 2020
Psychometric evaluation of the Marijuana Reduction Strategies Self-Efficacy Scale with young recreational marijuana
Alan K Davis1, Lawrence A Osborn1, Harold Rosenberg1
1Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, 822 E. Merry Ave, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States.
Introduction:
This study evaluated the cue-reactivity and several psychometric properties of a questionnaire designed to assess marijuana users' self-efficacy to employ 21 specific cognitive-behavioral strategies to reduce their marijuana use.
Method:
Using a web-based recruitment and data-collection procedure, 513 regular marijuana users completed dependent measures following marijuana-related or control cue exposure.
Results:
Although exposure to marijuana-related stimuli significantly increased reported craving, mean reduction-strategy self-efficacy scores did not differ as a function of cue exposure. Reliability analyses supported retaining all 21 items as a single scale. Reduction-strategy self-efficacy was positively associated with marijuana-refusal self-efficacy and with recent past use of reduction strategies, was negatively associated with quantity and frequency of marijuana use and marijuana-related problems, and was positively but weakly associated with general self-efficacy. The most frequently reported strategies that were employed reflected restricting marijuana use to once per day, not keeping a large stash available, turning down unwanted hits, and not obtaining more marijuana right away if one's supply runs out.
Conclusions:
These findings further support the reliability and validity of the questionnaire when administered to a diverse sample of regular marijuana users.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Regulation
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-Efficacy
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-Discrepancy Theory

