Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in aseptic revision arthroplasty
Anas Saleh1, Albair Guirguis1, Alison K Klika1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract:
Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic revision arthroplasty can be difficult to interpret. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who received antibiotic therapy according to an institutional protocol with those who did not and whether they meet Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. In patients who were treated with antibiotic according to institutional criteria, the incidence of PJI after revision was higher in those who did not meet MSIS criteria (22%) than in those that met MSIS criteria (14%; P > 0.71). UPIC in aseptic revision arthroplasty are not uncommon. PJI cannot be excluded in patients that do not meet MSIS definition.
Insights
Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures during revision arthroplasty can indicate infection. Even without meeting strict criteria, patients may still develop periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after surgery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
Background:
- Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) complicate the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in revision arthroplasty.
- Interpreting UPIC in presumed aseptic cases requires careful consideration of subsequent infection development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of subsequent PJI in patients treated with antibiotics based on institutional protocol versus those not treated.
- To evaluate if patients met Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study design.
- Analysis of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty with UPIC.
- Comparison of PJI incidence based on antibiotic treatment and MSIS criteria adherence.
Main Results:
- UPIC are not uncommon in aseptic revision arthroplasty.
- Patients treated with antibiotics according to institutional criteria who did not meet MSIS criteria had a higher incidence of PJI (22%) compared to those who met MSIS criteria (14%).
Conclusions:
- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) cannot be excluded in patients with UPIC who do not meet MSIS definition.
- Clinical judgment and adherence to treatment protocols are crucial for managing UPIC in revision arthroplasty.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management