Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Mouse Kidney Transplantation: Models of Allograft Rejection
Published on: October 11, 2014
Kidney retransplantation: removal or persistence of the previous failed allograft?
P Dinis1, P Nunes1, L Marconi1
1Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
Abstract:
A significant percentage of patients with failed renal graft are candidates for retransplantation. The outcomes of retransplantation are poorer than those of primary transplantation and sensitization is documented to be a major reason. The management of a failed allograft that is not immediately symptomatic is still very controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the failed allograft nephrectomy on a subsequent transplantation and its importance in the sensitization. We performed a retrospective analysis of the local prospective transplantation registry of the outcome of 126 second kidney transplantations among 2438 transplantations performed in our unit between June 1980 and March 2013, comparing those who underwent allograft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation with those who retained the failed graft. Primary endpoints were graft and patient survival. The levels of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) and rate of acute rejections on retransplantation outcomes were also studied. Among the 126 patients who underwent a second renal transplantation, 76 (60.3%) had a prior graft nephrectomy (Group A), whereas 50 (39.7%) kept their failed graft (Group B). Group A showed significantly more positive PRA levels when compared with the other group (38% vs 10%; P < .001), as measured before the most recent transplantation, and a higher rate of acute rejection (19% vs 5.6%; P = .016). There were 28 (36%) renal allograft losses for Group A and 18 (36%) for those who had not had transplantectomy (P = not significant [NS]). One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 96.6%, 90.7%, and 83.4%, respectively, in Group A and 95%, 82%, and 68.4%, respectively, in Group B, with no statistical differences (P = .19). Five-year actuarial patient survival rates in the 2 groups was 89.3% and 82.8%, respectively (P = .55). Multivariate analysis showed that PRA level and delayed graft function (DGF) had a statistically significant influence on graft survival (P = .028; odds ratio [OR] = 1.029; and P = .024; OR = 8.6), irrespective of whether the patient had graft nephrectomy or not. The allosensitization indicated by PRA increases after transplantectomy and leads to a higher incidence of acute rejection after retransplantation. Nephrectomy of failed allograft does not seem to significantly influence the survival of a subsequent graft. The decision to remove or retain a failed graft in the context of retransplantation should thus be based on known clinical indications for the procedure.
Insights
Removing a failed kidney transplant (allograft nephrectomy) before retransplantation increases sensitization and acute rejection rates. However, it does not significantly impact subsequent graft survival outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation immunology
Background:
- Retransplantation is an option for many patients with failed kidney grafts, but outcomes are generally poorer than primary transplants.
- Patient sensitization, indicated by panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), is a major factor contributing to reduced retransplantation success.
- The management of asymptomatic failed kidney allografts prior to retransplantation remains a clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of failed kidney allograft nephrectomy on subsequent transplantation outcomes.
- To assess the role of allograft nephrectomy in patient sensitization (PRA levels) and acute rejection rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 126 second kidney transplantations from a prospective registry (1980-2013).
- Comparison of outcomes between patients who underwent prior allograft nephrectomy (Group A) and those who retained the failed graft (Group B).
- Primary endpoints included graft and patient survival; secondary endpoints included PRA levels and acute rejection rates.
Main Results:
- Group A (nephrectomy) had significantly higher PRA levels (38% vs 10%) and acute rejection rates (19% vs 5.6%) compared to Group B.
- Graft loss rates were similar between groups (36% vs 36%).
- One-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates (83.4% vs 68.4%) and patient survival rates (89.3% vs 82.8%) showed no statistically significant differences between groups.
Conclusions:
- Allograft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation increases allosensitization and acute rejection incidence.
- Nephrectomy of a failed kidney allograft does not significantly affect the survival of a subsequent transplant.
- Decision to perform nephrectomy should be based on individual clinical indications rather than solely on improving retransplantation outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations

