Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
The CarboMedics supra-annular Top Hat valve improves long-term left ventricular mass regression
Victor X Mosquera1, Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera2, Victor Bautista-Hernandez1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Insights
The supra-annular CarboMedics Top Hat valve offers superior hemodynamic performance compared to the intra-annular standard valve, leading to greater left ventricular mass reduction. This valve is recommended for patients with small aortic roots and severe hypertrophy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cardiac Valve Prosthetics
Background:
- Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a common procedure.
- Small aortic roots and severe myocardial hypertrophy present challenges in AVR.
- Hemodynamic performance of mechanical valves is crucial for long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the hemodynamic performance of the supra-annular CarboMedics Top Hat valve and the intra-annular CarboMedics standard valve.
- To evaluate long-term left ventricular mass reduction and transvalvular gradients.
- To identify optimal valve choice for specific patient profiles.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 186 patients undergoing AVR with small mechanical prostheses (2003-2013).
- Comparison between CarboMedics Top Hat (n=53) and CarboMedics standard (n=133) valves.
- Analysis of in-hospital mortality, left ventricular mass reduction, aortic gradients, and survival rates.
Main Results:
- The Top Hat group showed significantly greater left ventricular mass reduction (33% vs. 20.1%, P < .001).
- The Top Hat group had lower postoperative peak aortic gradients (19.9 vs. 29.6 mm Hg, P < .001).
- Survival rates were comparable, but severe myocardial hypertrophy was an independent predictor of survival.
Conclusions:
- The supra-annular Top Hat valve demonstrates superior hemodynamic performance over the intra-annular standard valve.
- The Top Hat prosthesis is particularly recommended for patients with small aortic roots and severe myocardial hypertrophy.
- Optimizing valve selection can improve patient outcomes after AVR.
Objective:
The present study aimed to identify potential differences in hemodynamic performance between the supra-annular CarboMedics Top Hat valve and the intra-annular CarboMedics standard valve in terms of the long-term left ventricular mass reduction and transvalvular gradients.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed a series of 186 consecutive patients who had undergone aortic valve replacement with a small size mechanical prosthesis at our institution from 2003 to 2013, receiving either a CarboMedics Top Hat valve (53 patients, valve size, 21 mm in 52.8% and 23 mm in 47.2%) or a CarboMedics standard prosthesis (133 patients, valve size, 19 mm in 14.3% and 21 mm in 85.7%).
Results:
The in-hospital mortality was 9.4% and 11.3% in the Top Hat and standard groups, respectively (P = .71). The mean percentage of left ventricular mass reduction was greater in the Top Hat group (33% ± 15.8% vs 20.1% ± 16.6%, P < .001). The mean postoperative peak aortic gradient was lower in the Top Hat group (19.9 ± 8.9 vs 29.6 ± 8.6 mm Hg; P < .001). Spearman analysis showed a positive correlation between the indexed effective orifice area and the percentage of left ventricular mass reduction (Rho = +0.65, P = .02). The survival in the Top Hat group was 79.7% and 71.7% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In the standard group, survival was 66.8% and 61.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively (log-rank test, 0.19). Cox regression demonstrated severe myocardial hypertrophy (hazard ratio, 2.559; 95% confidence interval, 1.095-5.981) as one of the independent predictors of survival.
Conclusions:
The Top Hat valve surpasses hemodynamically the intra-annular valve. We suggest the supra-annular Top Hat prosthesis can be especially recommended for patients with a small aortic root and severe myocardial hypertrophy.
More Related Videos
07:24Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
07:42An Image Guided Transapical Mitral Valve Leaflet Puncture Model of Controlled Volume Overload from Mitral Regurgitation in the Rat
Published on: May 19, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care