Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Egoism and Altruism01:55

Egoism and Altruism

91.1K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
91.1K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

29.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
29.8K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

354
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
354
Altruism01:03

Altruism

29.8K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
29.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulling up the ladder: Enduring adversity increases opposition to reform.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Citation penalties following sexual versus scientific misconduct allegations.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Identifying Dietary Triggers Among Individuals with Overweight and Obesity: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Evaluations are inherently comparative, but are compared to what?

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Once and Again: Repeated Viewing Affects Judgments of Spontaneity and Preparation.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

Reply to Shah et al. & Lynch et al.: In defense of replication.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

14.7K

Paying more when paying for others.

Minah H Jung1, Leif D Nelson1, Ayelet Gneezy2

  • 1Haas School of Business.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|August 19, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Perceptions of kindness drive generosity in economic transactions. The pay-it-forward model increases generosity more than pay-what-you-want by fostering overestimations of others' kindness.

More Related Videos

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

26.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

14.7K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

26.8K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Consumer Behavior

Background:

  • Social behavior is significantly shaped by how individuals perceive the actions of others.
  • Misperceptions of kindness can lead to increased generosity in economic exchanges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how perceptions of kindness influence generosity in consumer elective pricing.
  • To compare behavior in pay-what-you-want versus pay-it-forward scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted 8 field and lab experiments involving consumer elective pricing.
  • Compared participant payments in pay-what-you-want and pay-it-forward conditions.
  • Assessed the role of perceived kindness, descriptive norms, and potential confusion.

Main Results:

  • Participants paid more in pay-it-forward scenarios than in pay-what-you-want scenarios.
  • Increased payments in pay-it-forward were linked to overestimating others' kindness when perceptions were ambiguous.
  • The effect diminished when explicit descriptive norms were provided.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptions of others' kindness, particularly when ambiguous, can significantly increase generosity.
  • The pay-it-forward framing enhances generosity by influencing these perceptions.
  • Understanding social perceptions is key to designing effective economic transactions.