Impact of perioperative glycemic control strategy on patient survival after coronary bypass surgery

Glycemic control in the perioperative period decreases mortality and morbidity, but data are scarce with regard to the effects of glucose control approaches on survival. We assessed long-term survival in patients treated with 2 strategies of glucose control after first-time isolated coronary artery bypass graft.

In a previously published trial, patients were prospectively randomized to strict (90-120 mg/dL) or liberal (121-180 mg/dL) glucose control protocols. The aim of this study was to assess long-term data on survival and health-related quality of life based on the original prospective randomized study population.

No differences were found in cumulative survival between the strict (95.5%) and liberal (93.5%) target range groups (log-rank = 0.32, p = 0.57) over a mean follow-up of 40.0 ± 4.4 months. Physical health-related quality of life significantly improved in all patients from baseline to 6 months after surgery (F = 17.73, p < 0.001), and there were no differences in improvement of health-related quality of life between the 2 target range groups (F = 0.15, p = 0.70).

These results support our previous findings and indicate that a liberal glycemic control strategy after coronary artery bypass leads to survival rates and improvements in health-related quality of life that are similar to those achieved with a strict target range. In addition, the liberal strategy is superior in glucose control and target range management.