Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancements in Gene Expression Regulation Research
Published on: September 15, 2023
The role of epigenetic-related codes in neurocomputation: dynamic hardware in the brain
Lawrence Edelstein1, John Smythies2
1Medimark Corporation, PO Box 2316, Del Mar, CA 92014, USA larry.edelstein@medimark.com.
Abstract:
This paper presents a review of recent work on the role that two epigenetic-related systems may play in information processing mechanisms in the brain. The first consists of exosomes that transport epigenetic-related molecules between neurons. The second consists of homeoproteins like Otx2 that carry information from sense organs to primary sensory cortex. There is developing evidence that presynaptic neurons may be able to modulate the fine microanatomical structure in the postsynaptic neuron. This may be conducted by three mechanisms, of which the first is well established and the latter two are novel. (i) By the well-established activation of receptors that trigger a chain of signalling molecules (second messengers) that result in the upregulation and/or activation of a transcription factor. The two novel systems are the exosome system and homeoproteins. (ii) Exosomes are small vesicles that are released upon activation of the axon terminal, traverse the synaptic cleft, probably via astrocytes and are taken up by the postsynaptic neuron. They carry a load of signalling proteins and a variety of forms of RNA. These loads may then be transported widely throughout the postsynaptic neuron and engineer modulations in the fine structure of computational machinery by epigenetic-related processes. (iii) Otx2 is a transcription factor that, inter alia, controls the development and survival of PV+ GABAergic interneurons (PV cells) in the primary visual cortex. It is synthesized in the retina and is transported to the cortex by a presently unknown mechanism that probably includes direct cell-to-cell transfer, and may, or may not, include transfer by the dynein and exosome systems in addition. These three mechanisms explain a quantity of data from the field of de- and reafferentation plasticity. These data show that the modality of the presynaptic neuron controls to a large extent the modality of the postsynaptic neuron. However, the mechanism that effects this is currently unknown. The exosome and the homeoprotein hypotheses provide novel explanations to add to the well-established earlier mechanism described above.
More Related Videos
11:19Correlating Gene-specific DNA Methylation Changes with Expression and Transcriptional Activity of Astrocytic KCNJ10 Kir4.1
Published on: September 26, 2015
10:09Isolation and Cultivation of Neural Progenitors Followed by Chromatin-Immunoprecipitation of Histone 3 Lysine 79 Dimethylation Mark
Published on: January 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Epigenetic Regulation
X-chromosome...
Epigenetic Regulation
Epigenetic Regulation
Neuroplasticity
The Role of Ion Channels in Neuronal Computation
Sometimes a single EPSP is strong enough to induce an action potential in the postsynaptic neuron. However, multiple presynaptic inputs must often create EPSPs around the same time for the postsynaptic neuron to be sufficiently depolarized to fire an action potential....
Role of Neurotransmitters in Memory
Glutamate and Synaptic Plasticity
Glutamate, the brain's main excitatory neurotransmitter, is...