Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Lateral-PLIF for Lumbar Spinal Arthrodesis: A Detailed Step-By-Step Surgical Technique
Published on: January 23, 2026
[The angular profile of a cage has no influence on segmental alignment after anterior cervical stand-alone interbody
P Barsa1, S Elgawhary, J Hradil
1Neurochirurgické oddělení, Neurocentrum, Krajská nemocnice Liberec.
Purpose Of The Study:
The original aim of this prospective semi-randomised study was to determine associations between segmental sagittal alignment after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and subjective and clinical results. Two types of cages, cage P with parallel end-plates and cage A with 5-degree angulations, were used in the patients treated for degenerative conditions.
Material And Methods:
A total of 94 consecutive patients, 56 treated by single-level ACDF and 38 undergoing a two-level procedure, completed 8 years of follow-up. The patients in equally-sized A and P subgroups were examined at 6 weeks and 1, 2 and 8 years after surgery. The follow-up included X-ray in a neutral lateral position, a questionnaire assessing pain in neck and shoulder regions and JOA scores. The results including the cumulative incidence of surgical procedures indicated for adjacent segment diseases were statistically evaluated.
Results:
An average increase in the lordotic angle at 6 weeks after surgery was 2.32° for the implant P and 2.02° for the implant A subgroup. During 8 years of follow-up the average values decreased to 1.51° and 1.36°, respectively. The proportion of patients with no or minimal neck and shoulder pain decreased, in subgroup P, from the initial 85% at 6 weeks to 59% at 8 years after the surgery and, in subgroup A, from 89% to 40 %. The average JOA score of 16 at 6 weeks in both subgroups, at 8 years, had a value of 15.9 in subgroup P and 16.0 in subgroup A. The cumulative incidence of surgery for adjacent segment disease 8 years was 8.3% for subgroup P and 6.3% for subgroup A. No statistically significant differences between the subgroups at any follow-up period were recorded in either morphological characteristics or clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
The ability to lordotize a segment by stand-alone ACDF is below the angular resolution of current radiographic methods, irrespective of the sagittal profile of the implant used. Comparable morphological results haven´t been reflected by significant difference in subjective and clinical outcome and also in the incidence of surgery for adjacent segment disease. Such results were not expected and therefore post-operative sagittal alignment mechanisms in stand-alone cage assisted ACDF will require further investigation. Key words:cervical vertebrae, surgical technique, spinal fusion, sagittal alignment, clinical outcome.

