Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Physiology Lab Demonstration: Glomerular Filtration Rate in a Rat
Published on: July 26, 2015
UK audit of glomerular filtration rate measurement from plasma sampling in 2013
Anthony W Murray1, Richard S Lawson, Sarah C Cade
1aDepartment of Medical and Sport Sciences, University of Cumbria, Lancaster bDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester cDepartment of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath dDepartment of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol eLink Medical, Bramshill fDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole gDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield hRadiological Sciences Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London iDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK jDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, St Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Introduction:
An audit was carried out into UK glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculation. The results were compared with an identical 2001 audit.
Methods:
Participants used their routine method to calculate GFR for 20 data sets (four plasma samples) in millilitres per minute and also the GFR normalized for body surface area. Some unsound data sets were included to analyse the applied quality control (QC) methods. Variability between centres was assessed for each data set, compared with the national median and a reference value calculated using the method recommended in the British Nuclear Medicine Society guidelines. The influence of the number of samples on variability was studied. Supplementary data were requested on workload and methodology.
Results:
The 59 returns showed widespread standardization. The applied early exponential clearance correction was the main contributor to the observed variability. These corrections were applied by 97% of centres (50% - 2001) with 80% using the recommended averaged Brochner-Mortenson correction. Approximately 75% applied the recommended Haycock body surface area formula for adults (78% for children). The effect of the number of samples used was not significant. There was wide variability in the applied QC techniques, especially in terms of the use of the volume of distribution.
Conclusion:
The widespread adoption of the guidelines has harmonized national GFR calculation compared with the previous audit. Further standardization could further reduce variability. This audit has highlighted the need to address the national standardization of QC methods. Radionuclide techniques are confirmed as the preferred method for GFR measurement when an unequivocal result is required.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Glomerular Filtration Rate
Renal Clearance
Renal clearance refers to the volume of plasma cleared of a specific substance, such as creatinine, per unit of time. To measure clearance, urine samples are collected over a 24-hour period during each bladder voiding, followed by a single blood sample at the...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Renal Drug Excretion: Glomerular Filtration
Drugs gain access to the kidney via the renal artery, which progressively branches off into afferent arterioles....
Glomerular Filtration Rate and its Regulation
GFR regulation involves two primary intrinsic controls: the myogenic and tubuloglomerular feedback mechanisms.
The myogenic...
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Measurement of Serum Creatinine Concentration and Clearance

