Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Preparation of SNS CobaltII Pincer Model Complexes of Liver Alcohol Dehydrogenase
Published on: March 19, 2020
Metallodithiolates as ligands to dinitrosyl iron complexes: toward the understanding of structures, equilibria, and
Tiffany A Pinder1, Steven K Montalvo, Chung-Hung Hsieh
1Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University , College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Abstract:
Metallodithiolate ligands are used to design heterobimetallic complexes by adduct formation through S-based reactivity. Such adducts of dinitrosyl iron were synthesized with two metalloligands, namely, Ni(bme-daco) and V≡O(bme-daco) (bme-daco = bismercaptoethane diazacyclooctane), and, for comparison, an N-heterocyclic carbene, namely, 1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene (Imes), by cleavage of the (μ-I)2[Fe(NO)2]2 dimer of electronic configuration {Fe(NO)2}(9) (Enemark-Feltham notation). With Fe(NO)2I as Lewis acid acceptor, 1:1 adducts resulted for both the IMes·Fe(NO)2I, complex 2, and V≡O(bme-daco)·Fe(NO)2I, complex 4. The NiN2S2 demonstrated binding capability at both thiolates, with two Fe(NO)2I addenda positioned transoid across the NiN2S2 square plane, Ni(bme-daco)·2(Fe(NO)2I), complex 3. Enhanced binding ability was realized for the dianionic vanadyl dithiolate complex, [Et4N]2[V≡O(ema)], (ema = N,N'-ethylenebis(2-mercaptoacetamide)), which, unlike the neutral (V≡O)N2S2, demonstrated reactivity with the labile tungsten carbonyl complex, cis-W(CO)4(pip)2, (pip = piperidine), yielding [Et4N]2[V≡O(ema)W(CO)4], complex 1, whose ν(CO) IR values indicated the dianionic vanadyl metalloligand to be of similar donor ability to the neutral NiN2S2 ligands. The solid-state molecular structures of 1-4 were determined by X-ray diffraction analyses. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements characterize the {Fe(NO)2}(9) complexes in solution, illustrating superhyperfine coupling via the (127)I to the unpaired electron on iron for complex 2. The EPR characterizations of 3 [Ni(bme-daco)·2(Fe(NO)2I)] and 4 [V≡O(bme-daco)·Fe(NO)2I] indicate these complexes are EPR silent, likely due to strong coupling between paramagnetic centers. Within samples of complex 4, individual paramagnetic centers with localized superhyperfine coupling from the (51)V and (127)I are observed in a 3:1 ratio, respectively. However, spin quantitation reveals that these species represent a minor fraction (<10%) of the total complex and thus likely represent disassociated paramagnetic sites. Computational studies corroborated the EPR assignments as well as the experimentally observed stability/instability of the heterobimetallic DNIC complexes.
Related Concept Videos
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
Complexometric Titration: Ligands
EDTA: Chemistry and Properties
Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes
Formation of Complex Ions

