Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protect soil, water and food systems in conflict: a global policy imperative.

Journal of the science of food and agriculture·2026
Same author

Resolving the Trade-Offs by Conservation Deep Tillage.

Global change biology·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Governance and resilience as entry points for transforming food systems in the countdown to 2030.

Nature food·2026
Same author

Aridity Drives the Response of Soil Organic Carbon and Inorganic Carbon to Drought in Cropland.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

Net zero and net negative emissions in brazilian biomes by no-till system.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Effects of coating agents on nitrogen dynamics and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

18.8K

Comparison of soil quality index using three methods.

Atanu Mukherjee1, Rattan Lal1

  • 1Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.

Plos One
|August 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Developing a soil quality index (SQI) is crucial for sustainable agriculture. This study compared three SQI methods, finding the statistically modeled SQI (SQI-3) best correlated with crop yield, highlighting its potential for soil management.

More Related Videos

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.9K
Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples
07:16

Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples

Published on: January 6, 2022

5.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

18.8K
Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot
07:11

Sampling Soils in a Heterogeneous Research Plot

Published on: January 7, 2019

35.9K
Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples
07:16

Comparison of Methods for Isolating Entomopathogenic Fungi from Soil Samples

Published on: January 6, 2022

5.2K

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Science
  • Soil Science
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Assessing management-induced soil quality changes is vital for sustaining crop yields.
  • A standardized Soil Quality Index (SQI) is needed due to soil diversity and lack of universal methods.
  • Previous attempts to estimate SQI have not established a universally accepted standard.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare three common methods for estimating Soil Quality Index (SQI).
  • To establish correlations between crop yield and SQI calculated using different soil layers.
  • To identify the most effective SQI estimation method for practical agricultural applications.

Main Methods:

  • Collected 72 soil samples from three on-farm sites in Ohio, encompassing organic and mineral soils.
  • Calculated SQI using three methods: simple additive (SQI-1), weighted additive (SQI-2), and statistically modeled via Principal Component Analysis (SQI-3).
  • Correlated SQI values with crop yield data, analyzing depth-wise and combined soil layer data.

Main Results:

  • SQI values varied by treatment and soil type, ranging from 0 to 0.9.
  • No significant differences in SQI were observed across different soil depths for any method.
  • The statistically modeled SQI (SQI-3) showed the strongest correlation with crop yield (0.74-0.78).
  • All three SQIs were highly correlated with each other (0.92-0.97) and with crop yield (0.65-0.79).

Conclusions:

  • The statistically modeled SQI (SQI-3) is a more reliable indicator of crop yield compared to simple or weighted additive methods.
  • Soil quality assessment may require crop-specific factors for accurate yield correlation.
  • Further research is needed to refine SQI methodologies for diverse agricultural systems.