Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Heart transplantation outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device-related complications
Mohammed A Quader1, Luke G Wolfe1, Vigneshwar Kasirajan1
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
Insights
Patients with device-related complications (DRC) on continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) experience reduced heart transplant survival. Careful consideration of CF-LVAD benefits versus DRC risks is crucial for patients awaiting heart transplantation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Transplantation Medicine
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Device-related complications (DRC) are a concern for patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs).
- This study examines heart transplant (HTx) outcomes for United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) Status 1A patients with CF-LVADs, comparing those with and without DRCs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of device-related complications (DRC) on heart transplant (HTx) outcomes in UNOS Status 1A patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of UNOS data from 2006-2012 for Status 1A patients undergoing HTx with CF-LVADs.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients with (DRC+) and without (DRC-) device-related complications.
- Further subgroup analysis of DRC+ patients based on UNOS categories B1-B5.
Main Results:
- The proportion of 1A listed patients supported by CF-LVADs increased significantly from 11.4% to 41.5% between 2006 and 2012.
- DRC+ patients (45%) had longer waiting times, higher prevalence of blood group O, and greater BMI compared to DRC- patients (55%).
- Post-HTx survival was significantly lower at 1 and 3 years for the DRC+ group (85.6% and 78%) versus the DRC- group (89.9% and 82.7%), with most complications in the B2 category.
Conclusions:
- An increasing number of heart transplant recipients are supported by CF-LVADs, with a rising incidence of DRCs, particularly in the B2 category.
- Post-transplant survival is inferior in patients with DRCs, especially those in the B2 category.
- The advantages of CF-LVADs must be balanced against the risks of DRCs and their impact on long-term heart transplant outcomes.
Background:
Device-related complications (DRC) can develop in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). We studied the heart transplant (HTx) outcomes of United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) Status 1A patients supported with CF-LVADs with (+) or without (-) DRCs.
Methods:
UNOS data (2006 to 2012) for patients listed under Status 1A with CF-LVADs at the time of HTx were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between the DRC+ and DRC- groups. The DRC+ group was further analyzed under 5 UNOS categories: B1 to B5.
Results:
Of the 6,799 patients who received HTx under 1A listing, 2,113 (31%) were supported with CF-LVADs. From 2006 to 2012, patients supported with CF-LVADs under the 1A listing increased from 11.4% to 41.5% (p = 0.0001). The DRC+ group (45%) compared with the DRC- group (55%) had longer waiting times (330 ± 323 days vs 168 ± 298 days), more patients with blood group O (57% vs 40%), and a higher body mass index (29 ± 5.5 kg/m(2) vs 27 ± 5 kg/m(2)). Most of the DRCs were in the B2 category (54%). Post-HTx survival for the DRC+ group was significantly reduced compared with the DRC- group at 1 year (85.6% vs 89.9%, p = 0.01) and at 3 years (78% vs 82.7%, p = 0.01), primarily due to B2 category.
Conclusions:
An increasing number of patients receiving HTx under 1A listing are supported with CF-LVADs. DRCs are steadily increasing, with most of them from the B2 category. Post-HTx survival in DRC+ group is inferior, primarily for the B2 category. The benefits of CF-LVADs for patients awaiting HTx need to be weighed against the development of DRCs with subsequently inferior post-HTx survival.
More Related Videos
07:39Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
05:18Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy