Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.1K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.1K
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

1.3K
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
1.3K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

478
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
478
Chunking01:12

Chunking

575
Chunking is a powerful cognitive technique that improves short-term memory retention by organizing information into smaller, more manageable units. The brain, limited by working memory capacity, can more easily process and store information when it is divided into "chunks" rather than presented as discrete, unrelated elements. Chunking is especially useful when dealing with large amounts of information, such as numerical sequences, words, or complex ideas.
The principle behind chunking...
575

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Too slow to see? Conscious vision and real-time behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Aperiodic parameters of the fMRI power spectrum associate with preterm birth and neonatal age.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Conscious and unconscious perception of pitch shifts in auditory feedback during vocalization: Behavioral functions and event-related potential correlates.

NeuroImage·2025
Same author

Gestational Duration and Postnatal Age-Related Changes in Aperiodic and Periodic Parameters in Neonatal and Toddler Electroencephalogram (EEG).

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

Multiple independent components contribute to event-related potential correlates of conscious vision.

Consciousness and cognition·2024
Same author

Introducing the Intra-Individual Variability Hypothesis in Explaining Individual Differences in Language Development.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Bilateral and two-item advantage in subitizing.

Henry Railo1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Finland; Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku, Finland.

Vision Research
|August 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Subitizing, the rapid enumeration of small item sets, shows a bilateral field advantage, improving speed even for two items. This enhancement is not explained by the redundant target effect (RTE).

Keywords:
AttentionBilateral field advantageRedundant target effectSubitizing

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

2.9K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

2.9K
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Numerical Cognition

Background:

  • Subitizing enables fast, accurate enumeration of small item quantities.
  • The bilateral field advantage, observed in other visual tasks, suggests enhanced processing when stimuli span both visual hemifields.
  • The redundant target effect (RTE) indicates faster reaction times to multiple stimuli compared to single stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if presenting items bilaterally enhances subitizing speed and scope compared to unilateral presentation.
  • To determine if the redundant target effect (RTE) explains the speed of subitizing.
  • To explore the relationship between RTE and subitizing speed.

Main Methods:

  • Participants enumerated small sets of items presented either unilaterally or bilaterally across visual hemifields.
  • Reaction times and accuracy were measured for different set sizes.
  • The correlation between subitizing speed and RTE was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • A significant bilateral field advantage was observed for subitizing, even with only two items.
  • The optimal condition for subitizing involved enumerating two items, with single-item enumeration being slower.
  • The RTE did not explain the observed bilateral field advantage; instead, it negatively correlated with subitizing speed.

Conclusions:

  • Bilateral visual field presentation enhances subitizing performance, extending to small set sizes.
  • Subitizing speed is not solely dependent on stimulus detection speed (RTE) and may involve distinct cognitive mechanisms.
  • The relationship between stimulus detection and enumeration speed is complex and warrants further investigation.