Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Turning policy implications into policy impact: Lessons from behavioral science in financial markets.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Science in service: Behavioral research applications across federal agencies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

The Political Psychology of Economic Inequality.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2026

Same author

Willful inattention: Keeping aversive information out of mind.

Current opinion in psychology·2025

Same author

Eliciting stock market expectations: The effects of question wording on survey experience and response validity.

The journal of behavioral finance·2025

Same author

Self-control ≠ temporal discounting.

Current opinion in psychology·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

Identifying a reliable boredom induction.

Amanda Markey¹, Alycia Chin, Eric M Vanepps

¹1 Carnegie Mellon University.

Perceptual and Motor Skills

|August 26, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers validated six boredom induction tasks. The peg-turning task proved most effective for eliciting boredom, offering a reliable method for future state boredom research.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Reducing State Anxiety Using Working Memory Maintenance

Published on: July 19, 2017

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Area of Science:

Psychology
Cognitive Science

Background:

Current methods for inducing boredom lack psychometric validation.
This deficit impacts study comparability, statistical power, and result interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

To rigorously test and compare the effectiveness of six 5-minute computerized boredom induction tasks.
To evaluate these tasks based on intensity (amount of boredom elicited) and discreteness (specificity to boredom).

Main Methods:

Six computerized tasks (peg turning, audio, video, signature matching, one-back, air traffic control) and a control task were evaluated.
Participants (N=241 in lab, N=416 online) were randomly assigned to a task and completed the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale (MSBS) and a modified Differential Emotion Scale (DES).

Main Results:

All six boredom induction tasks showed significantly higher intensity and discreteness compared to the control task.
The peg-turning task demonstrated superior performance in both intensity and discreteness across both study settings.

Conclusions:

The peg-turning task is recommended as a reliable and valid method for inducing boredom in research.
Standardized and validated boredom induction methods are crucial for advancing state boredom research.