Assessing factor structure and convergent validity of the work regulatory focus scale
11 Department of Management, City University of Hong Kong.
Psychological Reports
|August 26, 2014
Summary
This study validated the Work Regulatory Focus Scale, finding its two-factor model effective for measuring work-related prevention and promotion. The scale shows good validity for assessing employee focus in organizational settings.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Workplace Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between prevention and promotion orientations.
- Understanding these orientations in the workplace is crucial for employee engagement and performance.
- Existing scales may not adequately capture work-specific regulatory focus dimensions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the factor structure of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale.
- To examine the concurrent validity of the scale by correlating its dimensions with the Chronic Regulatory Focus Questionnaire.
- To establish the reliability and validity of a new scale for measuring work-related regulatory focus.
Main Methods:
- Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the scale's structure.
- Data were collected from 237 full-time employees in Hong Kong via computer-assisted telephone interviews.
- Pearson correlations and mean score differences were analyzed to assess validity.
Main Results:
- A two-factor model (prevention and promotion) for the Work Regulatory Focus Scale demonstrated adequate fit.
- Excluding two items improved fit indices, resulting in a 10-item scale.
- Significant, though low, correlations (range .19-.39) were found between work-related and chronic regulatory focus subscales, supporting concurrent validity.
Conclusions:
- The 10-item Work Regulatory Focus Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring work-related prevention and promotion focus.
- Findings support the scale's utility in organizational psychology research and practice.
- Further research is recommended to explore the scale's validity across diverse populations and contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
1.0K
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
1.0K
Factorial Design
13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
3.4K
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the...
In contrast, source traits are the...
3.4K
Reliability and Validity
12.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.9K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
1.3K
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
1.3K
Five-Factor Theory of Personality
2.4K
The five-factor model, often called the Big Five personality traits, is widely accepted in psychology as a comprehensive framework for understanding personality. These five traits — Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism — are often remembered using the acronym OCEAN.
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
2.4K


