Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
Published on: March 4, 2022
Flagrant Misconduct of Reviewers and Editor: A Case Study
Boris Kotchoubey1, Sarah Bütof, Ranganatha Sitaram
1Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Silcherstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany, boris.kotchoubey@uni-tuebingen.de.
Abstract:
A case of a particularly severe misbehavior in a review process is described. Two reviewers simply copied and pasted their critical comments from their previous reviews without reading the reviewed manuscript. The editor readily accepted the reviewers' opinion and rejected the manuscript. These facts give rise to some general questions about possible factors affecting the ethical behavior of reviewers and editors, as well as possible countermeasures to prevent ethical violations.
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Proofreading
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
Proofreading
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview

