Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Multicolor Fluorescence Localization in Lung Carcinoma Sample
Published on: November 21, 2023
EGFR mutation specific immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct which helps to identify false negative mutation
Michelle Houang1, Loretta Sioson, Adele Clarkson
11Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Northern Translational Cancer Research Unit, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards 2Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards 3Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney 4HistoPath Pathology, North Ryde 5Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 6School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney 7Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards 8Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst 9University of NSW, Sydney 10Department of Anatomical Pathology, SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Abstract:
Mutations in EGFR guide treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The most common mutations, exon 19 (delE746-A750) and exon 21 (L858R), can be identified by mutation specific immunohistochemistry (IHC). We present our prospective experience of universal reflex IHC and molecular testing in non-squamous NSCLC in the routine clinical setting.A total of 411 specimens from 332 patients were encountered over two years. Of these, 326 (98%) patients underwent EGFR IHC, 15 (5%) were positive for exon 19 deletions and 27 (8%) for exon 21 (L858R); 244 (73%) patients underwent molecular testing. Seventy-six mutations in 64 patients (19% of all patients encountered; 26% with sufficient material for testing) were identified. These comprised nine exon 18 (G719X) mutations, three also with exon 20 mutations; 24 exon 19 deletions, six also with exon 20 mutations; 23 exon 21 (L858R), three also with exon 20 mutations; and 8 exon 20 alone.All 15 exon 19 IHC positive patients were proven mutated (100% specificity, 63% sensitivity). Twenty-two of 27 exon 21 IHC positive cases were proven mutated while three patients had insufficient material for molecular testing (92% specificity, 96% sensitivity). The overall specificity and sensitivity of IHC for any EGFR mutation was 95% and 58%. Five patients initially thought to be wild type for EGFR but IHC positive underwent repeat molecular testing because of the discrepancy which confirmed the IHC result in three cases (60%).We conclude IHC is very specific but not sensitive. Whilst IHC cannot replace molecular testing, it is a useful adjunct which requires minimal tissue and identifies false negative molecular results which occurred in 5% of our patients with eventually confirmed EGFR mutations.
More Related Videos
11:15Next Generation Sequencing for the Detection of Actionable Mutations in Solid and Liquid Tumors
Published on: September 20, 2016
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018