Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.8K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.8K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.1K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.1K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.6K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.6K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Health Care-acquired Urinary Tract Infections From Electronic Nursing Documentation.

Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN·2025
Same author

Diagnostic accuracy of routine hematological biomarkers for complications and prognosis in bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

World journal of emergency surgery : WJES·2025
Same author

Photocontrolled ultra-broadband metamaterial absorber around the terahertz regime.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2024
Same author

Data Preparation for Supervised Learning: Improving Nursing Situation Awareness to Reduce Healthcare-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2024
Same author

Predicting recovery following stroke: Deep learning, multimodal data and feature selection using explainable AI.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2024
Same author

From explanation to intervention: Interactive knowledge extraction from Convolutional Neural Networks used in radiology.

PloS one·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K

A causal loop approach to the study of diagnostic errors.

Shijing Guo1, Abdul Roudsari2, Artur d'Avila Garcez3

  • 1Centre for Health Informatics, City University London, UK.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|August 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Diagnostic errors impact patient safety, but a systematic approach is lacking. This study uses a causal loop diagram to map factors influencing diagnostic errors, offering a clearer understanding of their interrelationships and impact.

More Related Videos

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

8.3K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.6K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality and Safety
  • Systems Engineering in Medicine
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors significantly affect patient safety and healthcare outcomes.
  • Existing research on diagnostic errors lacks a systematic, integrated approach.
  • Understanding the complex interplay of factors contributing to diagnostic errors is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a systematic method for studying diagnostic errors.
  • To identify key factors contributing to diagnostic errors and their interrelationships.
  • To visualize the dynamics of diagnostic error causation using a causal loop diagram.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review was conducted to identify factors influencing diagnostic errors.
  • Causal loop diagramming, a system dynamics modeling technique, was employed.
  • The diagram was developed to map identified factors and their interrelationships.

Main Results:

  • Key direct and indirect factors affecting correct diagnosis were identified.
  • The causal loop diagram visually represents the complex interdependencies between factors.
  • The model illustrates how changes in one factor can trigger cascading effects on others, influencing diagnostic error rates.

Conclusions:

  • The causal loop diagram provides a systematic framework for analyzing diagnostic errors.
  • This approach enhances understanding of the dynamic system influencing diagnostic accuracy.
  • The model can inform strategies to mitigate diagnostic errors and improve patient safety.