Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Neural Correlates of Palliative Care: A Feasibility Trial in Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal and Lung Cancer.

Research square·2026

Same author

Global alignment and assessment of TRP channel transmembrane domain structures to explore functional mechanisms.

eLife·2020

Same author

The ion selectivity filter is not an activation gate in TRPV1-3 channels.

eLife·2019

Same author

C-terminal α-synuclein truncations are linked to cysteine cathepsin activity in Parkinson's disease.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2019

Same author

Effects of attention on visual experience during monocular rivalry.

Vision research·2013

Same author

When to fire: anticipatory versus postevent reconstrual of uncontrollable events.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2004

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

Pupil dilation dynamics track attention to high-level information.

Olivia E Kang¹, Katherine E Huffer¹, Thalia P Wheatley¹

¹Psychological & Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States of America.

|August 28, 2014

Summary

Pupil dilation tracks attentional effort, synchronizing with stimuli during focused attention but not mind-wandering. This confirms pupil dynamics reflect cognitive processing beyond basic sensory input.

More Related Videos

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

Area of Science:

Cognitive Neuroscience
Psychology
Ophthalmology

Background:

Pupil dilation is a known indicator of attentional effort.
Previous research linked pupil dilation to stimulus changes during attention.
The role of low-level sensory changes versus high-level cognitive processing remained unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine if pupil dilation synchrony with stimuli reflects cognitive processing or low-level luminance changes.
To replicate and clarify findings on pupil dynamics as a readout of conscious information processing.

Main Methods:

Replication of Smallwood et al. (2011) methodology.
Presentation of isoluminant digit sequences to control for luminance shifts.
Monitoring pupillary dilations during periods of attention and mind-wandering.

Main Results:

Pupillary dilations were synchronized with stimulus onsets during attention.
This synchronization was absent during mind-wandering.
The findings held true even when controlling for luminance variations.

Conclusions:

Stimulus-pupil coupling is a dynamic readout of online cognitive processing.
This coupling reflects attention to information, not just sensory changes.
Pupil dynamics provide a window into conscious information processing.