Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.0K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.0K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

22.4K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
22.4K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

28.1K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
28.1K
Maslow's Humanistic Approach on Personality01:28

Maslow's Humanistic Approach on Personality

1.5K
Abraham Maslow, a prominent figure in humanistic psychology, developed a theory centered on self-actualization, which he placed at the top of his hierarchy of needs. According to Maslow, self-actualization represents achieving one's full potential and is a rare accomplishment attained by approximately 2% of the population. Maslow identified notable historical figures such as Thomas Jefferson, Mahatma Gandhi, Helen Keller, and Martin Luther King Jr. as examples of self-actualized...
1.5K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

37.0K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
37.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

57.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What Sustains Wars: Will to Fight Versus Military Might.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same author

When group grievances become personal: The neural correlates of group and personal rejection.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025
Same author

Transcultural pathways to the will to fight.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

Willingness to sacrifice among convicted Islamist terrorists versus violent gang members and other criminals.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Spiritual over physical formidability determines willingness to fight and sacrifice through loyalty in cross-cultural populations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

The will to fight.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2021
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Split-Ubiquitin Based Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid MYTH System: A Powerful Tool For Identifying Protein-Protein Interactions
14:04

Split-Ubiquitin Based Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid MYTH System: A Powerful Tool For Identifying Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: February 1, 2010

30.7K

Martyrdom's would-be myth buster.

Scott Atran1

  • 1CNRS - Institut Jean Nicod,Ecole Normale Supérieure,29 rue d'Ulm,75005 Paris,France. satran@umich.edu http://sitemaker.umich.edu/satran/home

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|August 28, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study critiques Lankford's overgeneralization of individual psychology, arguing it neglects crucial group dynamics and situational factors. The findings suggest the book

More Related Videos

Nanothermite with Meringue-like Morphology: From Loose Powder to Ultra-porous Objects
07:46

Nanothermite with Meringue-like Morphology: From Loose Powder to Ultra-porous Objects

Published on: December 24, 2017

7.2K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

14.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Split-Ubiquitin Based Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid MYTH System: A Powerful Tool For Identifying Protein-Protein Interactions
14:04

Split-Ubiquitin Based Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid MYTH System: A Powerful Tool For Identifying Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: February 1, 2010

30.7K
Nanothermite with Meringue-like Morphology: From Loose Powder to Ultra-porous Objects
07:46

Nanothermite with Meringue-like Morphology: From Loose Powder to Ultra-porous Objects

Published on: December 24, 2017

7.2K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

14.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Sociology
  • Political Science

Background:

  • The study critically examines Lankford's work, which overemphasizes individual psychology.
  • It highlights the underestimation of strategic, ideological, and group dynamical factors in social behavior analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the overgeneralization of individual psychology in Lankford's analysis.
  • To identify the manifestation of fundamental attribution error in explaining social behavior.
  • To evaluate the influence of ideological preferences versus scientific and national security interests on the book's reception.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of Lankford's arguments and materials.
  • Application of social psychology principles, specifically the fundamental attribution error.
  • Comparative assessment of scientific, national security, and ideological motivations.

Main Results:

  • Lankford's claims are based on limited and questionable evidence.
  • The analysis reveals a tendency to overestimate personality and underestimate situational influences (fundamental attribution error).
  • The book's popularity may stem from ideological alignment rather than scientific merit or national security relevance.

Conclusions:

  • Lankford's approach oversimplifies complex social behaviors by focusing excessively on individual psychology.
  • The work demonstrates a cognitive bias, the fundamental attribution error, in its interpretation of social dynamics.
  • Ideological factors appear to be a more significant driver of the book's appeal than its scientific or national security contributions.