Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
Reward context determines risky choice in pigeons and humans
Elliot A Ludvig1, Christopher R Madan2, Jeffrey M Pisklak2
1Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, H1.21 Humanities Building, Coventry, UK e.ludvig@warwick.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Whereas humans are risk averse for monetary gains, other animals can be risk seeking for food rewards, especially when faced with variable delays or under significant deprivation. A key difference between these findings is that humans are often explicitly told about the risky options, whereas non-human animals must learn about them from their own experience. We tested pigeons (Columba livia) and humans in formally identical choice tasks where all outcomes were learned from experience. Both species were more risk seeking for larger rewards than for smaller ones. The data suggest that the largest and smallest rewards experienced are overweighted in risky choice. This observed bias towards extreme outcomes represents a key step towards a consilience of these two disparate literatures, identifying common features that drive risky choice across phyla.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Instinctive Drift
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Mate Choice
Optimal Foraging
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

