Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Ecological Niches

Ecological Niches

All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

Conservation of Small Populations

Conservation of Small Populations

Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

3D cell segregation geometry and dynamics are governed by tissue surface tension regulation.

Communications biology·2023

Same author

Optimized flocking of autonomous drones in confined environments.

Science robotics·2020

Same author

Absence makes the heart grow fonder: social compensation when failure to interact risks weakening a relationship.

EPJ data science·2020

Same author

Glassy nature of hierarchical organizations.

Scientific reports·2017

Same author

Friction forces position the neural anlage.

Nature cell biology·2017

Same author

Social insect colony as a biological regulatory system: modelling information flow in dominance networks.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2014

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

Collective foraging in heterogeneous landscapes.

Kunal Bhattacharya¹, Tamás Vicsek²

¹Department of Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Rajasthan 333031, India kunalb@pilani.bits-pilani.ac.in.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface

|August 29, 2014

Summary

Group foraging for resources is optimized with intermediate aggregation, not overcrowding or independent searching. This finding is crucial for understanding collective search strategies in heterogeneous environments.

Keywords:

Lévy walks heterogeneous landscapes optimal foraging theory

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Published on: November 17, 2023

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Author Spotlight: Exploring Behavioral Pathways Through Cross-Species Insights in Foraging and Communication

Published on: November 17, 2023

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

Ecology
Behavioral Ecology
Collective Behavior

Background:

Individual foragers often use Lévy walks to optimize resource encounter rates.
The impact of multi-forager interactions on collective search efficiency remains poorly understood.
Understanding group dynamics is key for optimizing resource discovery in ecological systems.

Purpose of the Study:

To model and analyze the optimal strategy for a group of foragers searching for heterogeneously distributed targets.
To investigate how inter-forager communication and aggregation influence search efficiency.

Main Methods:

A computational model simulating foragers on a square lattice with immobile, regenerative targets.
Foragers detect targets at their current location and can use information about other foragers' discoveries.
A probabilistic rule governs foragers moving towards detected resources based on distance and aggregation propensity (α).

Main Results:

Neither extreme overcrowding (α → 0) nor completely independent searching (α → ∞) maximizes search efficiency.
Optimal search efficiency for patchy target distributions occurs at intermediate aggregation propensities (α).
Scale-free walk lengths can emerge in the limit of high aggregation (α → 0).

Conclusions:

Intermediate levels of aggregation and information sharing are crucial for efficient group foraging.
The study highlights a trade-off between individual search patterns and collective benefits in resource discovery.
Findings have implications for understanding animal group behavior and optimizing search strategies in complex environments.