Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

36.8K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
36.8K
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

8.3K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
8.3K
Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

4.1K
Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age-specific and time-dependent trends in health-related quality of life after minor stroke: results of a cross-sectional cohort study.

BMJ neurology open·2026
Same author

Between guidelines and reality: expert neurologists' perspectives on structural resources for ALS care in Germany.

Neurological research and practice·2026
Same author

Absence of evidence for post-training tDCS effects on motor memory consolidation and premotor-primary motor cortex interaction: a resting-state EEG study.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Comprehensive effects of Parkinson's disease multimodal complex treatment (PD-MCT): a two-center prospective trial.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Temporal Discrimination and Proprioceptive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence for Distinct Sensory Dysfunction Mechanisms.

Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Cross-species lesion mapping links a midbrain circuit to vergence dysfunction.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

18.5K

Sensory processing and the rubber hand illusion--an evoked potentials study.

Daniel Zeller1, Vladimir Litvak, Karl J Friston

  • 1University of Würzburg.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|August 30, 2014
PubMed
Summary

The rubber hand illusion (RHI) demonstrates how the brain integrates conflicting sensory information. Brain activity patterns reveal distinct neural responses during illusory ownership versus veridical perception.

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

4.9K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

18.5K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

4.9K
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
09:38

Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities

Published on: January 29, 2014

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The rubber hand illusion (RHI) is a tool to study multisensory integration and perceptual inference.
  • Understanding how the brain resolves conflicting sensory inputs is crucial for explaining body ownership perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the functional neuroanatomy underlying the rubber hand illusion.
  • To identify brain activity patterns associated with illusory ownership and veridical perception using electroencephalography (EEG).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized multichannel EEG to record brain activity during the RHI paradigm.
  • Compared evoked potentials from EEG signals under three tactile stimulation conditions: REAL (no artificial hand), CONGRUENT (synchronous, plausible), and INCONGRUENT (synchronous, impossible).
  • Analyzed differences in response amplitudes at specific electrode locations approximately 55 milliseconds post-stimulation.

Main Results:

  • The RHI was reliably elicited in the CONGRUENT condition.
  • Illusory ownership (CONGRUENT) showed smaller response amplitudes in specific brain regions compared to non-illusory conditions (REAL, INCONGRUENT).
  • Veridical perception (INCONGRUENT) amplified responses in contralateral sensorimotor and parietal areas.

Conclusions:

  • Findings support predictive coding models of multisensory integration.
  • The results suggest that the brain attenuates somatosensory precision to resolve conflicting multisensory information during perceptual inference.
  • Specific EEG patterns correlate with the subjective experience of body ownership during sensory conflict.