Time sensitivity-corrected retention index: an enhanced metabolic index from 18F-FDG PET to differentiate between
Ching-yee O Wong1, Zaid Al-faham, Prashant Jolepalem
1aDepartment Diagnostic Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak bCranbrook Educational Community, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan cUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract:
The aim of the study was to evaluate pulmonary nodules (PNs) by incorporating time sensitivity (S) factor in the retention index (RI) and compare with the traditional fixed interval method. After obtaining approval from the Human Investigations Committee, 97 PNs from 81 patients (age=70±11) referred for dual-time fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET (16.1±1.9 mCi) with definite pathological diagnosis or 1-year computed tomography follow-up were retrospectively studied. S=d{ln[SUV]]/d{ln[T]} was obtained by logarithmic regression using scan times, T (0, 1, 2), and standard uptake value (SUV) (0, 1, 2). This time-corrected RI, RIs=[(T2/T1)-1]×100%, was compared with traditional fixed time interval RI, RIx=[(SUV2/SUV1)-1]×100%, by means of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The mean±SD of T1 and T2 (72.3±14.0 and 134.9±17.6 min, respectively) skewed markedly from the intended time of PET scans (skewness=2.076 and 1.356, respectively). There were 27 benign tumors, 37 cases of non-small-cell lung cancer, 15 other types of cancer, and 18 stable lesions by 1-year computed tomography follow-up. There were significant differences between the nonmalignant group (NM, n=45) and the cancer group (CA, n=52) in time sensitivity (0.186±0.161 vs. 0.483±0.180, P<0.0005) and RIs (12.7±12.5 vs. 37.4±17.5%, P<0.0005). The RIx showed wider variation than RIs, although the difference between NM and CA was also significant (18.0±28.8 vs. 37.8±32.0%, P=0.002). The RIs and RIx were only weakly correlated (r=0.257, P=0.011). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis performed for the CA or NM groups revealed a significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy for malignancy by RIs (area under the curve=0.880±0.035, P<0.0005) compared with RIx (area under the curve=0.694±0.054, P=0.001). Incorporating the time sensitivity factor improves the diagnostic performance of RI for malignant PNs by using additional biologic information from the variation in fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake times and rates.
More Related Videos
10:04Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
09:03Radiotracer Administration for High Temporal Resolution Positron Emission Tomography of the Human Brain: Application to FDG-fPET
Published on: October 22, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
