Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
Mortality benefits of different hemodialysis access types are age dependent
Caitlin W Hicks1, Joseph K Canner1, Isibor Arhuidese1
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Therapy, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md.
Insights
Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) offer the best survival for dialysis patients across all ages. Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) benefit older adults, while their advantage over catheters (HCs) is unclear in the very young or old.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Dialysis vascular access type significantly impacts mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease.
- Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are associated with lower mortality compared to arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and hemodialysis catheters (HCs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of age at hemodialysis initiation on patient mortality across different vascular access types (AVF, AVG, HC).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 507,791 US Renal Data System patients (2006-2010) aged 18 and older.
- Utilized spline modeling and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models to assess age-related mortality.
- Compared mortality risks associated with initial AVF, AVG, or HC placement.
Main Results:
- Increasing age independently predicted higher mortality (aHR, 1.03; P < .001).
- AVFs demonstrated the lowest mortality risk (aHR, 0.63; P < .001) versus HCs, followed by AVGs (aHR, 0.83; P < .001).
- AVF superiority was consistent across all age groups. AVG benefit over HC was observed in patients aged 49-89, but not in those 18-48 or >89 years.
Conclusions:
- Arteriovenous fistulas are the optimal dialysis access, providing superior survival benefits irrespective of patient age.
- The mortality advantage of arteriovenous grafts over catheters is age-dependent, primarily benefiting middle-aged to older adults.
- Younger patients (18-48 years) should prioritize AVF placement for dialysis access to maximize survival outcomes.
Objective:
Risk of death in dialysis patients is lowest with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), followed by arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) and then intravenous hemodialysis catheters (HCs). Our aim was to analyze the effects of age at hemodialysis initiation on mortality across different access types.
Methods:
All patients ≥18 years in the United States Renal Data System between the years 2006 and 2010 were analyzed. Spline modeling and risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the effect of age on mortality for first dialysis access with AVF vs AVG vs HC.
Results:
The study analyzed 507,791 patients (63.4 ± 0.02 years; 56.5% male; 40.9% mortality; follow-up, 1.57 ± 1.36 years). Increasing age was a significant predictor of overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.03; P < .001). Compared with patients with HCs (n = 418,932), overall risk-adjusted mortality was lowest in patients with AVFs (n = 71,316; aHR, 0.63; P < .001) followed by AVGs (n = 17,543; aHR, 0.83; P < .001). AVF was superior to both HC and AVG for all age groups (P < .001). However, there was a significant change in the relative efficacy of AVG at ages 48 years and 89 years based on spline modeling; there were no significant differences comparing adjusted mortality with AVG vs HC for patients aged 18 to 48 years or for patients >89 years, but AVG was superior to HC for patients 49 to 89 years of age (aHR, 0.811; P < .001). The mortality benefit of AVF was consistently superior to that of AVG and HC for patients of all ages (all, P < .001).
Conclusions:
AVF is superior to AVG and HC regardless of the patient's age, including in octogenarians. In contrast, the mortality benefit of AVG over HC may not apply to younger (18-48 years) or older (>89 years) age groups. All patients 18 to 48 years should receive AVF for dialysis access whenever possible.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management

