Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

09:31
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
14.4K
Hydroxyapatite coating does not improve uncemented stem survival after total hip arthroplasty!
Nils P Hailer1, Stergios Lazarinis, Keijo T Mäkelä
1Department of Orthopaedics , Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala , Sweden.
Acta Orthopaedica
|September 2, 2014
Summary
Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating on uncemented hip stems does not significantly improve implant survival or reduce revision risk due to aseptic loosening or infection. This study questions the added clinical value of HA coating in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Implant Technology
Background:
- Debate exists regarding the efficacy of hydroxyapatite (HA) coating on uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Assessing implant survival and revision rates is crucial for uncemented hip stem designs.
- Understanding the impact of surface coatings on long-term implant performance is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of HA coating on the early and long-term survival of uncemented hip stems.
- To compare revision rates for aseptic loosening and infection between HA-coated and non-HA-coated uncemented stems.
- To evaluate the clinical relevance of HA coating across different uncemented stem brands.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 116,069 total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database (1995-2011).
- Comparison of 22 uncemented stem brands, with and without HA coating, focusing on revision endpoints.
- Utilized Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to determine hazard ratios (HRs) for revision risk.
Main Results:
- Unadjusted 10-year survival for any component revision was 92.1%.
- HA coating showed no statistically significant effect on the adjusted risk of stem revision due to aseptic loosening (HR 0.8; p=0.4).
- The adjusted risk of revision due to infection was similar for HA-coated and non-HA-coated stems (HR 0.9; p=0.6).
Conclusions:
- Uncemented HA-coated stems demonstrated similar outcomes to uncemented stems with porous or sand-blasted surfaces.
- The presence of HA coating had no clinically relevant impact on the outcome of well-functioning stem designs.
- The study suggests that HA coating may not add significant value to established uncemented hip stem designs.

