Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

359
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
359
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

685
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
685
Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

6.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
6.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.6K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.6K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

2.9K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mortality after emergency presentation: evidence from a cohort of 929 378 Medicare beneficiaries with common cancers diagnosed 2008-2017.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Large language models for cancer registry abstraction: a real-world evaluation across models, variables, and cancer types.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Risk of Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals After the Pandemic Emergency.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Estimating and discovering heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning in epidemiological studies: a practical guide.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of maternal COVID-19 vaccination varies by gestational timing: results from a claims-based cohort study, 2020-2022.

Research square·2026
Same author

Association Between Purchase of Organic Food and Hypertension Among US Adults: NHANES 2007-2010.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Selection bias modeling using observed data augmented with imputed record-level probabilities.

Caroline A Thompson1, Onyebuchi A Arah2

  • 1Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA; Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA.

Annals of Epidemiology
|September 2, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for internal adjustment of selection bias in observational studies. The technique uses inverse probability weighting to correct for bias, enabling more accurate estimation of exposure-outcome associations.

Keywords:
Casual inferenceEpidemiologic methodsSelection bias

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 25, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Observational Studies

Background:

  • Selection bias is a significant threat to the validity of observational studies, particularly in case-control and follow-up designs.
  • Existing external adjustment methods for selection bias are often simplistic and cannot simultaneously adjust for exposure, covariates, and outcome associations.
  • Internal adjustment via inverse probability weighting has been limited to longitudinal studies with complete covariate data up to loss to follow-up.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate a novel method for internal adjustment of selection bias in observational studies.
  • To enable adjustment for selection bias even when covariate data on unobserved participants are unavailable.
  • To allow simultaneous adjustment of exposure and covariate associations with the outcome.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized inverse probability weighting combined with externally obtained bias parameters.
  • Applied the method to perform internal adjustment for selection bias in studies lacking complete covariate data.
  • Analyzed data from the selected stratum (responders) weighted by the inverse probability of selection based on observed covariates.

Main Results:

  • Successfully obtained the true, selection-adjusted odds ratio for the exposure-outcome association.
  • The method accurately estimated associations by weighting observed data according to selection probabilities.
  • Demonstrated the feasibility of internal adjustment using inverse probability weighting and user-supplied bias parameters.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed internal adjustment technique is applicable to all types of observational studies.
  • This method provides a robust approach to address selection bias when covariate data are incomplete.
  • Facilitates more reliable estimation of associations in the presence of selection bias.