Impact of transient or persistent slow flow and adjunctive distal protection on mortality in ST-segment elevation
Toshiharu Fujii1, Naoki Masuda, Masataka Nakano
1Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, 259-1193, Japan.
Insights
Routine distal protection is not recommended for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, it may reduce mortality in STEMI patients experiencing slow flow complications after primary PCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management involves primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Slow flow or no-reflow phenomenon is a known complication impacting outcomes after primary PCI.
- Distal protection devices are used to prevent distal embolization during PCI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of slow flow on 180-day mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
- To assess the efficacy of adjunctive distal protection following primary thrombus aspiration in STEMI patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 414 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
- Patients categorized into three groups: no thrombus aspiration (A-), thrombus aspiration without distal protection (A+/D-), and thrombus aspiration with distal protection (A+/D+).
- Distal protection was selectively used in high-risk slow flow cases.
Main Results:
- 180-day all-cause mortality was significantly higher with persistent slow flow (44.4%) compared to no slow flow (6.8%) or transient slow flow (14.1%).
- Distal protection did not significantly alter mortality in STEMI patients without slow flow complications.
- In STEMI patients with transient or persistent slow flow, distal protection use was associated with reduced 180-day all-cause mortality (38.5% in A-, 23.3% in A+/D-, 10.8% in A+/D+).
Conclusions:
- Routine use of distal protection in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI is not recommended.
- Distal protection may be beneficial in reducing mortality for STEMI patients who develop slow flow/no-reflow.
- Accurate prediction of slow flow before PCI remains a clinical challenge.
Abstract:
Routine use of distal protection for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not recommended. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of slow flow on mortality after STEMI, and the efficacy of adjunctive distal protection following primary thrombus aspiration. We retrospectively analyzed 414 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. Distal protection was used following primary thrombus aspiration only when the operator judged the patient to be at high risk of slow flow. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those receiving no thrombus aspiration (A- Group), thrombus aspiration without distal protection (A+/D- Group) or a combination of aspiration with distal protection (A+/D+ Group). Slow flow/no reflow was characterized as transient or persistent. The A-, A+/D-, and A+/D+ Groups consisted of 28.5 % (n = 118), 44.4 % (n = 184), and 27.1 % (n = 112) of patients, respectively. All-cause mortality at 180 days was 6.8 % without slow flow, 14.1 % with transient and 44.4 % with persistent slow flow (P < 0.0001), but was similar whether or not distal protection was used among these groups complicated without slow flow (A-, 8.7 %; A+/D-, 6.3 %; A+/D+, 4.3 %; P = 0.5854). However, in cases complicated with transient or persistent slow flow, distal protection reduced all-cause mortality to 38.5 % (A-), 23.3 % (A+/D-), and 10.8 % (A+/D+) at 180 days (P = 0.0114). Our data confirm that routine distal protection is not to be recommended. However, it is suggested that it could reduce mortality of patients with slow flow. Predicting slow flow accurately before PCI, however, remains a challenge.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
