Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Outcomes mapping: a method for dental schools to coordinate learning and assessment based on desired characteristics
Galen B Schneider1, Marsha A Cunningham-Ford2, David C Johnsen2
1Dr. Schneider is Executive Associate Dean, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; Prof. Cunningham-Ford is Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; Dr. Johnsen is Dean, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; Ms. Eckert is Academic Clinical Program Management Specialist, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; and Mr. Mulder is Senior Systems Administrator, The University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics. galen-schneider@uiowa.edu.
Abstract:
This project, utilizing a seldom-used approach to dental education, was designed to define the desired characteristics of a graduating dental student; convert those characteristics to educational outcomes; and use those outcomes to map a dental school's learning and assessment programs, based on outcomes rather than courses and disciplines. A detailed rubric of the outcomes expected of a graduating dental student from this school was developed, building on Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) standards and the school's competencies. The presence of each characteristic in the rubric was mapped within and across courses and disciplines. To assess implementation of the rubric, members of two faculty committees and all fourth-year students were asked to use it to rate 1) the importance of each characteristic, 2) the extent to which the school teaches and assesses each, and 3) the extent to which each counts toward overall assessment of competence. All thirty-three faculty members (100 percent) on the committees participated, as did forty-six of the fifty-five students (84 percent). The groups gave high scores to the importance of each characteristic, especially for knowledge and technical competence (then separate categories but merged in the final rubric) and for self-assessment, as well as the extent to which they are being taught and assessed. Respondents most commonly named critical thinking as the area that should be emphasized more. Mapping the curriculum and creating its related database allow the faculty and administration to more systematically coordinate learning and assessment than was possible with a course-based approach.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Evaluation
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation

