Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sanger Sequencing01:57

Sanger Sequencing

800.3K
DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...
800.3K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

37.8K
Overview
37.8K
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

4.2K
DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
4.2K
Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

87.5K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
87.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ankh-Score Produces Better Sequence Alignments Than AlphaFold3.

Proteins·2026
Same author

Protein embeddings and local alignments.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same author

Component puzzle protein-protein interaction prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Explainability of Protein Deep Learning Models.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Scoring alignments by embedding vector similarity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2024
Same author

Seq-InSite: sequence supersedes structure for protein interaction site prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2024
Same journal

STED: flexible cross-modal topic modeling infers cell-type-specific regulatory landscapes from bulk epigenomics.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A knowledge-guided deep learning framework for quantitative nucleic acid testing.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Optimal transport for label transfer in single-cell multi-omics integration.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating completeness, coherence, and consistency of genome-scale function annotations.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Transformers for single-cell RNA sequencing: a survey.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K

Correcting Illumina data.

Michael Molnar, Lucian Ilie

    Briefings in Bioinformatics
    |September 4, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study compares error correction programs for next-generation sequencing data. It evaluates their performance on Illumina data, offering practical guidelines for effective use and suggesting future research directions.

    Keywords:
    DNA sequencingIllumina datacoverage breadthcoverage deptherror correction

    More Related Videos

    Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
    09:34

    Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

    Published on: April 4, 2018

    36.1K
    Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example
    05:45

    Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example

    Published on: March 11, 2020

    10.9K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

    Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
    10:36

    Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

    Published on: August 3, 2018

    14.6K
    Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
    09:34

    Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

    Published on: April 4, 2018

    36.1K
    Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example
    05:45

    Validating Whole Genome Nanopore Sequencing, using Usutu Virus as an Example

    Published on: March 11, 2020

    10.9K

    Area of Science:

    • Genomics
    • Bioinformatics

    Background:

    • Next-generation sequencing (NGS) generates vast amounts of genetic data crucial for biomedical research.
    • Data errors in NGS significantly impact downstream applications.
    • Numerous error correction tools exist, primarily for Illumina data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To comprehensively compare existing error correction programs for Illumina sequencing data.
    • To evaluate the performance and efficiency of these tools.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of both HiSeq and MiSeq Illumina data.
    • Evaluation of correction performance based on coverage gain (correct reads and k-mers).
    • Assessment of computational resources (time, memory) and scalability.

    Main Results:

    • Performance comparison of various error correction programs on Illumina data.
    • Identification of effective tools and practical usage guidelines.
    • Evaluation of current state-of-the-art program efficiency.

    Conclusions:

    • Provides practical guidelines for selecting and using error correction tools for Illumina data.
    • Highlights areas for improvement in current error correction methodologies.
    • Informs future research directions for enhanced NGS data accuracy.