Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026
Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
Published on: August 26, 2014
Surveillance in ulcerative colitis: is chromoendoscopy-guided endomicroscopy always better than conventional
Paulo Freire1, Pedro Figueiredo, Ricardo Cardoso
1*Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; †Center of Gastroenterology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; ‡Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; and §Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar Leiria-Pombal, Leiria, Portugal.
Background:
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Chromoendoscopy showed superiority to conventional colonoscopy (CC) in surveillance studies including high-risk patients. We aimed to compare chromoendoscopy-guided endomicroscopy (CGE) with CC for intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) detection in patients with longstanding UC without primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or history of IN.
Methods:
One hundred sixty-two patients with longstanding (≥ 8 yr) distal/extensive UC and without primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or history of IN were prospectively randomized to undergo CGE (group A) or CC (group B). Seventeen patients were excluded. In group A (n = 72), circumscribed lesions highlighted by pan-chromoendoscopy were evaluated by endomicroscopy, and targeted biopsy/polypectomy was performed. In group B (n = 73), 4 random biopsies every 10 cm and targeted biopsy/polypectomy of detected lesions were performed.
Results:
Thirteen IN, all low grade, were detected: 7 IN in group A and 6 in group B (P > 0.05), distributed, respectively, by 6 and 4 patients (P > 0.05). Significantly, more biopsies were performed in group B (4.7 ± 4.9 versus 36.0 ± 6.2, P < 0.001), and the per-biopsy yield of IN was higher in group A (1/48 versus 1/438, P < 0.001). Examination time was 61.5 ± 15.6 minutes in group A and 40.7 ± 8.7 minutes in group B (P < 0.001). The IN detection by endomicroscopy revealed: sensitivity = 85.7%, specificity = 97.9%, positive predictive value = 75.0%, and negative predictive value = 98.9%.
Conclusions:
CGE does not improve the detection of IN in the endoscopic screening of patients with longstanding UC without primary sclerosing cholangitis and/or history of IN. CGE takes longer than CC, but it decreases the number of biopsies performed and significantly increases the per-biopsy yield of IN. Endomicroscopy is an accurate tool for IN detection.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
09:01Non-invasive Assessment of the Efficacy of New Therapeutics for Intestinal Pathologies Using Serial Endoscopic Imaging of Live Mice
Published on: March 10, 2015
Related Concept Videos
01:28Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
01:25Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
01:26Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
01:26Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
01:29Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD