Acute kidney injury after CABG versus PCI: an observational study using 2 cohorts

Tara I Chang1, Thomas K Leong2, Derek B Boothroyd1

  • 1Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Insights

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after coronary revascularization. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) significantly increases AKI risk compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Nephrology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a recognized complication following coronary revascularization procedures.
  • Limited comparative data exists on AKI incidence between coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if multivessel CABG, as an initial revascularization strategy, presents a higher risk of AKI compared to PCI.
  • To compare AKI incidence in patients undergoing CABG versus PCI for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing their first coronary revascularization.
  • Utilized two cohorts: Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Medicare beneficiaries.
  • Defined AKI based on serum creatinine changes or dialysis in respective cohorts.

Main Results:

  • AKI incidence was 20.4% in the Kaiser Permanente cohort and 6.2% in the Medicare cohort.
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) showed a 2- to 3-fold increased odds of AKI compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • Less than 1% of AKI cases required dialysis.

Conclusions:

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) is prevalent after multivessel coronary revascularization.
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with a higher incidence of AKI than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • Consideration of AKI risk is crucial when selecting revascularization strategies; AKI prevention methods are needed.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos