Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

4.1K
Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
4.1K
Sound Intensity00:58

Sound Intensity

4.1K
The loudness of a sound source is related to how energetically the source is vibrating, consequently making the molecules of the propagation medium vibrate. To measure the loudness of a source, the physical quantity of interest is the intensity. This is defined as the energy emitted per unit of time per unit of area perpendicular to the sound wave's propagation direction. Since the total energy is greater if the source vibrates for a longer duration and over a larger area, dividing the...
4.1K
Sound Intensity Level00:53

Sound Intensity Level

4.0K
Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
4.0K
Sound as Pressure Waves01:17

Sound as Pressure Waves

3.3K
Sound waves, which are longitudinal waves, can be modeled as the displacement amplitude varying as a function of the spatial and temporal coordinates. As a column of the medium is displaced, its successive columns are also displaced. As the successive displacements differ relatively, a pressure difference with the surrounding pressure is created. The gauge pressure varies across the medium.
The pressure fluctuation depends on the difference in displacements between the successive points in the...
3.3K
Intensity and Pressure of Sound Waves01:05

Intensity and Pressure of Sound Waves

1.9K
The intensity of sound waves can be related to displacement and pressure amplitudes by using their wave expressions and the definition of intensity. The critical step to achieve this is to write the power delivered by the particles on the wave as the product of force and velocity and simplify the force per unit area as the pressure. The velocity of the medium's particles can be derived from the displacement.
Unlike the time average of a sinusoidal term, which is zero since it is positive...
1.9K
Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change01:26

Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change

517
Unsoundness in aggregates due to volume changes is primarily caused by the physical alterations aggregates undergo, such as freezing and thawing, thermal changes, and wetting and drying. Unsound aggregates, when subjected to these changes, result in volume change upon disintegration. This, in turn, contributes to the deterioration of concrete, including scaling, pop-outs, and cracking. Particular types of aggregates, such as porous flints, cherts, and those containing clay minerals, are...
517

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robust frame-level speaker localization guided by multi-channel speech enhancement and inter-channel phase-difference losses.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Spatially selective active noise control systems.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Improved efficiency of vibration-based sound power computation through multi-layered radiation resistance matrix symmetry.

JASA express letters·2022
Same author

A coherence-based phase and amplitude gradient estimator method for calculating active acoustic intensity.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

Vibration-based sound power measurements of arbitrarily curved panels.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

Solving one-dimensional acoustic systems using the impedance translation theorem and equivalent circuits: A graduate level homework assignment.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Microparticle Manipulation by Standing Surface Acoustic Waves with Dual-frequency Excitations
06:51

Microparticle Manipulation by Standing Surface Acoustic Waves with Dual-frequency Excitations

Published on: August 21, 2018

6.4K

Generalized acoustic energy density based active noise control in single frequency diffuse sound fields.

Buye Xu1, Scott D Sommerfeldt2

  • 1Signal Processing Research, Starkey Hearing Technologies, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|September 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers introduce generalized acoustic energy density (GED) to improve active noise control. Minimizing GED expands the quiet zone, balancing sound attenuation and energy addition for better noise reduction.

More Related Videos

Evanescent Field Based Photoacoustics: Optical Property Evaluation at Surfaces
10:21

Evanescent Field Based Photoacoustics: Optical Property Evaluation at Surfaces

Published on: July 26, 2016

12.5K
Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles
10:14

Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles

Published on: March 6, 2016

12.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 24, 2026

Microparticle Manipulation by Standing Surface Acoustic Waves with Dual-frequency Excitations
06:51

Microparticle Manipulation by Standing Surface Acoustic Waves with Dual-frequency Excitations

Published on: August 21, 2018

6.4K
Evanescent Field Based Photoacoustics: Optical Property Evaluation at Surfaces
10:21

Evanescent Field Based Photoacoustics: Optical Property Evaluation at Surfaces

Published on: July 26, 2016

12.5K
Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles
10:14

Fabrication and Operation of Acoustofluidic Devices Supporting Bulk Acoustic Standing Waves for Sheathless Focusing of Particles

Published on: March 6, 2016

12.8K

Area of Science:

  • Acoustics
  • Signal Processing
  • Noise Control Engineering

Background:

  • Traditional active noise control in diffuse sound fields offers limited spatial quiet zones.
  • Far-field sound pressure levels can increase significantly beyond the primary cancellation zone.
  • Existing methods struggle to balance attenuation with added acoustic energy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the generalized acoustic energy density (GED) for active noise control.
  • To investigate the effect of GED weighting factors on the spatial extent of quiet zones.
  • To achieve a controllable balance between sound attenuation and total acoustic energy.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of generalized acoustic energy density (GED) using a weighting factor.
  • Minimization of GED at an error sensor in a diffuse sound field.
  • Analysis of the spatial characteristics of the resulting quiet zone.

Main Results:

  • Minimizing GED allows for adjustable spatial extent of the quiet zone.
  • The weighting factor in GED controls the trade-off between quiet zone size and attenuation.
  • GED-based control can mitigate the increase in averaged sound pressure levels observed in traditional methods.

Conclusions:

  • Generalized acoustic energy density (GED) offers a flexible approach to active noise control.
  • GED enables enhanced spatial control over noise reduction zones.
  • This method provides a tunable way to manage acoustic energy distribution during noise cancellation.