Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 24, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of the Influence of Primary Closure or Dressing on Post-operative Morbidity
Peter E Egbor1, Birch D Saheeb1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria.
Objective:
The aim of the following study is to determine the effect of primary closure or dressing on post-operative morbidity after impacted lower third molar surgery.
Materials And Methods:
This was a randomized clinical study of 72 patients who had surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. The subjects were divided into two groups of A and B. Group A had total closure (primary closure) and Group B had whitehead varnish dressing of the socket. Pain, swelling and trismus were evaluated pre-operatively using visual analogue scale, flexible tape measuring method and inter-incisal distance measurement with Vernier Callipers respectively as well as post-operatively on 1(st), 2(nd), 3(rd), 5(th) and 7(th) day.
Results:
The study participants consisted of 27 males and 45 females in a ratio 1:1.7. With a mean age of 24.7 ± 4.9 years (range 19-33 years) for Group A and 25.5 ± 4.3 years (range 20-39 years) for Group B. Post-operative pain was not significantly affected by the closure techniques (P > 0.05). Dressing was found to significantly reduce the degree of swelling and trismus peaking on the 2(nd) day (P = 0.0207 and P = 0.010 respectively).
Conclusion:
The use of dressing was more effective than primary closure to reduce the degree of swelling and trismus though its effect on post-operative pain reduction was not significant.
